SirCharlz

1 Vote

pilgrimagerock 13 years, 6 months ago on Former PM calls ruling on last speech 'bogus'

Sir Lynden Pindling got to say his farewell message because the FNM administration made it possible. They could have allowed the late former Prime Minister to stick around until the entire former cabinet ministers had their say but they didn’t out of respect. This new, new PLP’s wants to have it both ways.

2 Vote

maryann 13 years, 6 months ago on Former PM calls ruling on last speech 'bogus'

THE PLP ACCUSED THE FORMER PM OF BEING A CLOWN WE NOW SEE WHO ARE THE REAL CLOWNS, THE HONORABLE HOUSE HAS NOW BEING TURN INTO A REAL CIRCUS AND NOT A FRIENDLY CIRCUS EITHER ,BUT ONE WHERE HATRED, SPITEFULNESS AND VEHEMENT IS A PART OF THE AGENDA.

1 Vote

Arob 13 years, 6 months ago on Former PM calls ruling on last speech 'bogus'

REPERCUSSIONS

We need clarification between the terms “promissory note” and “resignation”. Based on the speaker’s definition, Human Resource Managers should be shivering. Traditionally, when one resigns it is (1) effective immediately, (2) effective according to the rules (usually two weeks after the date of the letter), and (3) effective at the date indicated.

IS THIS EMPLOYMENT SCENARIO POSSIBLE? Imagine Joe Exuma submitting a resignation effective at a future date. Mr. Exuma’s proposed job falls through and he decides to argue that his letter was a “promissory note” and that he has the right to rescind his letter because the effective date is in the future.

The employer says no, we accepted your resignation. Mr. Exuma’s lawyer points to the Speaker's interpretation of Mr. Ingraham’s letter.

http://tribune242.com/users/photos/2012…