0

BNT voices concern over sunken cargo ship

THE SCENE of the sinking, in this image provided to The Tribune.

THE SCENE of the sinking, in this image provided to The Tribune.

By EARYEL BOWLEG

Tribune Staff Reporter

ebowleg@tribunemedia.net

THE BAHAMAS National Trust has expressed concerns about the cargo ship that recently sank off the southern coast of Abaco and its impact on the marine environment.

In a statement on Friday, BNT indicated concern about the location of this vessel as it is currently within the Cross Harbour Protected Area.

On December 29, 2022, Onego Traveller sank in waters in the southern part of Abaco with heavy fuel onboard.

The general cargo ship registered in Antigua and Barbuda, built in 2002, reportedly began taking on water in the ballast water tank area near Hole in the Wall, off South Abaco.

The Department of Environmental Planning and Protection (DEPP) has been in communication with the BNT to provide updates on the situation.

“We know that the Onego Traveller vessel was transporting Kemira Ferix-3, an industrial granulated solid used in wastewater treatment, odour control, and fertiliser. This chemical along with fuel from the vessel has been observed in the surrounding sea since the vessel’s sinking. “The BNT is reaching out to experts in environmental chemistry and toxicology to better understand the spill’s environmental impact,” the statement said.

“The primary concern around the Ferix is how it will affect water quality in the short and long term. It is currently impacting the pH of the water surrounding the sunken vessel, creating highly acidic conditions. If the Ferix acts as a fertiliser in the seawater, this could also lead to harmful algal blooms which negatively impact marine life and have health impacts on people exposed in and around the water. The scale and extent of such impacts will depend on the amount of the chemical ultimately released into the environment and other nutrient levels in the seawater.”

The statement added: “The BNT is especially concerned about the location of this vessel. lt is currently within the Cross Harbour Protected Area. This marine protected area was declared in 2015 to protect important terrestrial and coastal ecosystems and was expanded in 2021 to include significantly more marine areas. This area is particularly important for bonefish, as it serves as a pre-spawning aggregation site which supports a vibrant fly-fishing industry of local and national economic significance. The vessel is also approximately seven miles south of the shoreline of the Abaco National Park managed by the BNT.”

BNT Executive Director Lakeshia Anderson-Rolle said, ”The BNT’s key concern at this time is the impact of the ship on the seabed and the potential impact of the vessel’s spilt chemical contents on coastal and marine organisms and habitats in the area, especially given that the vessel is currently within the boundaries of a marine protected area, not yet assigned to any protected area management agency. If the chemicals are not quickly and properly contained they can potentially spread to other areas.

“The BNT is prepared to support any remediation or monitoring efforts, including the creation of long-term policies to prevent or respond more quickly to such incidences in the future. We have been in constant communication with the director of DEPP, who has requested assistance to conduct ecological assessments; and our park wardens and scientists are on standby and ready to help with these efforts as soon as it is safe to do so.”

Speaking to reporters at a BNT event earlier yesterday, Ms Anderson-Rolle spoke in detail about the work on the ground.

“We actually also have our senior science officer on standby, we will be providing support to the ministry on the ecological assessments. We are familiar with the area, it's actually an area that has been established or approved as a protected area since 2015. It was also recently expanded in 2021. So our concern really has to do with the fact that it is actually within a protected area. And so we are on standby to provide support for the government with respect to making sure that no physical damage has been done, but we anticipate that that may be the case. But we are working and speaking with experts in the field of environmental chemistry and toxicology to really determine the impacts of chemicals in saltwater.”

Asked about concerns about possible impact to wildlife, the executive director noted: “The last update we received, they were containing the chemicals, obviously, because it's been contained, it hasn't really been spreading to really cause a major impact. We're only really waiting to be able to get in the water to see the impacts for ourselves to be able to make that assessment.”

The BNT is pleased that the government has already responded to this incident by deploying measures to contain any spillage and initiating a meeting of the National Oil Spill Contingency Advisory Committee (NOSCAC).

In a statement released recently, the Ministry of Transport and Housing confirmed that a meeting with members of the NOSCAC was held to discuss the way forward.

Comments

ThisIsOurs 1 year, 4 months ago

"The BNT’s key concern at this time is the impact of the ship on the seabed"

the seabed they supposed to be basing carbon credit tokens on?

1

sheeprunner12 1 year, 4 months ago

So, why has BNT not said a word about Calypso Cove building a cruise port on top of the largest grouper schooling site in the Caribbean off Southend, Long Island???

Eric Carey made all kind of noise when it came to Disney in south Eleuthera ........ But he was quiet when it came to south Long Island.

Wonder why??? Where is the voice of the new BNT boss???

1

Baha10 1 year, 4 months ago

Appears no one outside of Long Island is aware … or cares about this🤷‍♂️

0

zemilou 1 year, 4 months ago

Perhaps because Carey is a paid consultant for the south Long Island project??!

0

Reality_Check 1 year, 4 months ago

Typical cheap gaslighting reporting by The tribune with little very investigative effort behind it.

Not a single word said about who in our government authorised passage of this vessel loaded with toxic cargo through Bahamian waters. Also nothing said about the ship's owner, who the cargo belongs to, the cargo's final destination, whether the ship's owner had adequate insurance to cover environmental damage risks, etc., etc.

The Fourth Estate in The Bahamas is dying faster than corruption is growing.

1

ThisIsOurs 1 year, 4 months ago

I have to agree, and not just this paper. the stories are rarely researched, they amount to whatever someone told the reporter, no information on what was independently gathered. Even pointing out some things commentors post as you did to say we asked but didn't get answers, I have to assume that this is a function of money and lack of it to either pay seasoned reporters or give seasoned reporters sufficient time to develop stories. But it's pretty bad.

1

ThisIsOurs 1 year, 4 months ago

Adding to your comment, what I find troubling are statements from everybody saying we're trying to figure out what damage will be caused. To me this makes that oil spill committee just another group of empty suits, just like the SCB with FTX, nobody brainstormed, before hand, what disaster would mean. Further to your comment, the committee should have a listing of every vessel passing through the country, what its carrying, the vessel insurance, and the impact should the vessel experience a negative event in open water or near shore. We know the types of organisms in the water, so we can proactively list what 1 day, 2 days, 5 weeks exposure will do, the equipment needed to remediate, where it can be sourced from and the time it will take.

1

Baha10 1 year, 4 months ago

Such assessment would appear to “directly” contradict the responsible local MP’s statement that there was no impact and we should not believe our lying eyes … wondering if he will be asked to resign, or instead will do so out of good conscience?

1

Commenting has been disabled for this item.