0

INSIGHT: Who really has Downtown’s interests at heart?

By TYLER MCKENZIE

THERE is something of a phony war going on – with Downtown Nassau being pulled this way and that like a chew toy.

Between the new cruise port, Royal Caribbean, Atlantis and the various parties looking to make a quick buck, poor old Downtown is caught in the middle.

Deputy Prime Minister Chester Cooper nailed it when he called on Atlantis to “put their money where their mouths are” over Downtown.

He wants Atlantis to partner with the Tourism Development Corporation to improve Downtown, saying: “I think they will answer the call.”

He said that back in mid-May, however, so perhaps the call went to answerphone.

Mr Cooper added: “Let me just say that there’s been a lot of noise about the Royal Caribbean development on Paradise Island. This is driven primarily by Atlantis, who cite that they have environmental concerns, and I’ve always said if they have environmental concerns there, there is a process that is available to have those environmental concerns [addressed]. If those concerns go beyond environmental, then there’s a process for expressing those as well.”

Online, there is a lot of talk about how different developments will hurt Downtown – especially focused on how Royal Caribbean will allegedly take visitors out from Bay Street. However this argument holds no basis in reality. Royal Caribbean’s beach club development will see their cruise line actually bring more tourists to Downtown as their cruise passenger numbers increase from one million passengers to 2.5 million. Even with the guests who will eventually trickle over to Paradise Island, there will still be half a million more guests on Bay Street because of this beach club experience.

So it was quite laughable to see a Facebook page called “Stopping the Downtown ByPass” pop up overnight pushing calculated misinformation about the Royal Caribbean development. Some persons saw right through it and questioned why should a private cruise line be asked to investment in Bay Street? Those buildings are owned by the Bay Street Boys - a group of elite white Bahamians who hail from the glory days of the United Bahamian Party (UBP) who themselves have failed to put a nickel in the upkeep of their own buildings. So we know they are not the ones who actually care about any “bypass” of their businesses. Bay Street has been in a state of disrepair for well over 30 years. If indeed “Bay Street” or “Downtown” was a real concern for the purveyors of this Facebook page they would focus their singular attention on the $300m cruise port that recently opened Downtown. With these new, beautiful buildings, open green spaces, and clean haggle-free shipping, tourists have no reason to move one block over to the litany of T-shirt, cosmetic jewellery, or Chinese-made products that occupy Bay Street.

So now that we have established that this Facebook page’s their real concern is not the actual survival of Downtown, or the “bypass of Downtown”, we can see who and what their agenda is - blocking this development at all costs on Paradise Island.

We are reminded of the recent spat that Atlantis had with the Bahamian owners of Wendy’s who have been trying to overturn their Town Planning approval for the establishment of a Wendy’s and Marcos Pizza in the old Scotiabank building on Paradise Island. Atlantis claimed that the fast-food eateries would not fit into the “esthetic of Paradise Island,” and that there is only high-end eating options, yada yada yada. Something didn’t pass the smell test for us, and we were right. A story in The Nassau Guardian and The Tribune showed that Atlantis themselves were bringing a ShakeShack to Paradise Island later this year. What does ShakeShack sell you ask? Hamburgers and fries. What does Wendys sell? Hamburgers and fries. A Wendys combo is priced at just under $10. We imagine the ShakeShack option would hover around $30-$40 if you’re lucky. So you do the math, and see for yourselves what the real “esthetic” concern is.

So we can put that and other baseless concerns to bed.

Now, let us jump back to Downtown.

What is missing from this whole conversation is a real discussion about what to do with Downtown. Certainly a beach club on Paradise Island is no threat whatsoever.

There is certainly little encouragement at present for Bahamian entrepreneurs to take advantage of what should be a resurgence in the area. I say should, because I am in no way confident of the certainty of such a thing.

In truth, such a resurgence should be well under way – it should have been timed to coincide with the opening of the cruise port so that the new development would have meshed seamlessly with the revived Downtown area. So much for that.

Former Tourism Minister Dionisio D’Aguilar pitched in, saying that we have to “figure out how to create this buzz and life Downtown”. That didn’t happen on his watch, and he talked of how governments have “pecked” at the problem, improving sidewalks and street lighting, which as far as I can see amounts to much the same as shuffling the deckchairs on the Titanic.

There is much talk about the dilapidated buildings to be seen if you turn left instead of right when you come out of the cruise port – but go one street back from Bay Street and the situation is even worse. There is no sign of a living, breathing community in these areas – just a few rundown properties and waste patches of land that double up as car parks. If Downtown is to become a thriving location at night as well as day, then there is no local community to back it up.

So much for all the problems, where are the solutions?

photo

ROYAL Caribbean and Atlantis seem to be uneasy neighbours - as the beach resort, which is to have $50m spent on just cleaning it up, will sit alongside the giant resort if all is approved.

Well, they don’t lie in seemingly phony concerns expressed only to cover self-interest. As Chester Cooper says, if concerns over the life and health of Downtown are part of Atlantis’ worries over the neighbouring Royal Caribbean project, then Atlantis can help invest to revive the area any time it wants.

Digging through social media arguments that seem to come from accounts that are there for the purpose of arguing on behalf of others doesn’t help to resolve this feeling of alienation that this is a debate that is not really about us.

What we as a people want seems secondary to what large interests are seeking. There are giants in the playground, and we are only called upon to “express our concerns” when it suits their agenda.

If we are to see serious and meaningful change Downtown, we cannot depend merely on the grace and favour of organisations that are too busy looking out for themselves – be it private entities, or it would seem these successive administrations that can do no more than peck.

What is the solution? Bahamians need to live downtown, and the strangle hold that the Bay Street Boys have enjoyed for generations needs to be lifted. Until a government, any government, has the will to enact eminent domain and take some of these old buildings for the public good, nothing will change for Downtown.

Comments

hrysippus 10 months, 4 weeks ago

A small correction is needed to this column. The anonymous entity behind this social media effort are paying for advertisements to appear of Facebook, I do not think that they have a page. It is a clumsy effort which I would expect from a lawyer or businessman who is not well grounded in marketing. I am reminded of that PLP lawyer who set up a fake Facebook page called SaveTheBaysAgain to imitate the original Save The Bays organization in order to try and discredit a wealthy expatriate resident It did not work thankfully.

0

themessenger 10 months, 4 weeks ago

Mr McKenzie needs to crawl back into his little crab hole and do some more research. Yes, at one time much of Bay Street was owned by the white oligarchy but over the last five decades much of that ownership has been transferred to the hands of the black oligarchy, the Greek Bahamian families and the Chinese. The governments of the last fifty years have placed onerous restrictions and property taxes on many of these properties, some even being designated as historical, preventing the owners, black and white, from developing those properties in a meaningful way. Why would anyone in their right mind “invest” in a property that they cannot realistically get a reasonable return on their investment? As for Wendy’s being denied access to upscale Paradise Island, well, I suppose Mr McKenzie doesn’t have a problem with a fast food restaurant or numbers house next door to him, perhaps he does. What a shallow piece of “journalism”, if this is the best the Tribune can offer the mighty have truly fallen.

1

ThisIsOurs 10 months, 4 weeks ago

This article doesn't do justice to the word "Insight". The question is asked who really has Bay St's interest at heart then concludes that Chester Copper is right about everything everyone who has an opposing view is wrong and Bay St needs wealthy residents.

The most glaring ommission the author made in his search of who doesnt have Bay St's interest at heart is "Govt of the Bahamas". While they've raided NIB and BOB for ill advised concerns personal and private for decades, Bay St has been allowed a steady visionless decline culminating in the garish painting of the straw Flea market as a symbol of "revival".

Bay St doesn't need foreign rich residents in high towers pushing residents "further south" and inland so they can be comfortable, what Bay St needs is parking and Bahamian shoppers

2

juju 10 months, 4 weeks ago

Racist and uninformed comments are unnecessary and not the truth.

1

Dawes 10 months, 4 weeks ago

This is a terrible article. The whole time slating one side for "Well, they don’t lie in seemingly phony concerns expressed only to cover self-interest", and yet the whole article is this so writer doing exactly that. I take it that as it is called an "insight" it can be the writers view with no journalistic skills involved. There is no confirmation of any of the assumptions made, just assumotions used to make the writers point.

0

ThisIsOurs 10 months, 4 weeks ago

I dont know, "Insight" implies some deep thinking was done that revealed some hidden truths, this article sounds like a speech from a campaign stage repeating the party line

0

sheeprunner12 10 months, 4 weeks ago

The Government needs to purchase the derelict parts of Downtown between East Street, the seashore and Shirley Street ....... set up PPP, and build a series of (at least five-storey) condomiums for those who wish to live there ............. along with creating a shorefront shopping district to join the Cruise Port to Sidney Poitier Bridge

There are many urban downtown models to choose from. But, something has to change soon.

0

Maximilianotto 10 months, 3 weeks ago

Nothing will happen. Who would invest in this toxic mix of certain cronies owned properties. They’ll survive and wait for the right time and price. Definitely they are in the driver’s seat not public Napoleon talking.

0

Sign in to comment