0

Bahamas needs $200m to replace lost WTO revenue

By NATARIO McKENZIE

Tribune Business Reporter

nmckenzie@tribunemedia.net

THE Bahamas will have to replace almost $200 million or 10.5 per cent of government revenues in a "realistic scenario" for WTO accession, a consultant has revealed.

Dr Derk Bienen, who helped drafted a government-funded study on the implications of becoming a full World Trade Organisation (WTO) member, illustrated the scale of the tax reform challenge facing the Bahamas when it starts to eliminate/reduce import tariffs that are seen as barriers to trade.

"In the current situation, you would have collectable duties of about $540 million," Dr Bienen explained. "If the realistic scenario comes into play you would be collecting $340 million, and so you would have a reduction of $196 million or, in percentage terms, 10.5 per cent of government revenues.

"That is just the reduction in duties. That is the effect of the increased level of imports and the reduced level of tariffs." Dr Bienen added that with many tariff lines reduced or eliminated, the Bahamas level of imports would increase, generating more VAT and Excise tax revenues once get passed the 'port of entry'.

This may partially compensate for the revenues foregone in reducing Customs duties, but reform and restructuring of the Bahamas' existing tax system will be one of the main WTO accession challenges that will impact virtually every Bahamian.

Among the Government's reform options is an increase to the existing 7.5 per cent Value-Added Tax (VAT) rate, or the introduction of new taxes and/or increases to other existing levies. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) last year suggested the Bahamas introduce a low-rate corporate tax to compensate for the WTO-related loss of revenue.

Dr Bienen told a WTO panel discussion at the University of the Bahamas (UoB) Harry C Moore library that Bahamian tariff rates are among the highest in the world, but around one-third of potential revenues are given up via tax break incentives and concessions

He added that all Bahamian tariff rates do not necessarily have to be lowered or eliminated, and this nation may be given time to phase-in the reductions once its terms of accession are determined.

"Duties in government revenues is still sizeable, but have greatly reduced overtime. In 2016-2017 in the Budget, the share of import duties was 15.4 per cent of total government revenues. This means that, in a worst case, a theoretical case, if all tariffs would have to be set at zero, government revenue would be reduced by 15.4 per cent and that's kind of an extreme theoretical limit," he added.

The Government-commissioned 'vulnerability study', highlighting the Bahamas' main weaknesses in a WTO accession, was prepared using 2015 data.

Dr Bienen said the revenue impacts were derived from a comparison of this nation's economy with Seychelles, which joined the WTO in 2015, and the previous offer prepared by the Bahamas government.

"We used a combination of those factors to come up with a scenario of what we thought was a likely outcome of the negotiations. That was then put into the model to calculate the revenue," he explained.

"What is also important is in the Bahamas there are high statutory tariffs and, at the same time, there are a lot of exemptions, and so many of those duties that are payable according to the statutory rates are not payable.

"It is a common practice in countries to have those exemptions in place, but the Bahamian case is a bit extreme. One third of the duty that is not being collected is quite a lot, and we took that into consideration."

Dr Bienen said the Bahamas faces four main vulnerabilities with respect to WTO - the reduction in tariffs and an immediate impact on government revenues; reduced protection for domestic industries behind the tariff wall; increased competition in both the goods and services sectors; and an imbalance of trade.

He added that WTO members are bound to respect the rules that govern trade-related laws and regulations. "You cannot do as you please. When you look at the most favoured nation principal (MFN), you could not - even if you wanted - apply one tariff on the imports of one county and one tariff on the imports of another," said Dr Bienen.

He added that the Bahamas faces 'limited vulnerabilities' in the service sector, but said WTO will not provide better market access or export opportunities than those granted to other countries. "They apply their tariffs and conditions on exports from the Bahamas just as they do any other country," Dr Bienen said.

Comments

Well_mudda_take_sic 6 years ago

It seems the only thing this Minnis-led FNM government and their crony consultants can talk about is raising taxes and fees on already over-burdened, honest and hardworking Bahamians and their businesses. What about cutting the costs associated with our grossly bloated and non-productive government, including government corporations? And I don't mean just replacing useless PLP Paul with equally useless FNM Peter!

0

joeblow 6 years ago

Can somebody please explain the benefits of this country joining the WTO? Not the benefits other countries would get, but the direct tangible benefits to this country!

0

BONEFISH 6 years ago

The taxation system will have to change when we joined the WTO.Custom duties will have to reduced and replaced by other taxes. The Bahamas is a country far behind the eight ball. The country in this hemisphere not a part of the WTO.Even tiny ST.Kitts and Nevis is a member.

0

John 6 years ago

So what about the monies that come from services that wasn't previously taxes boat dockage fees real estate fees,legal fees accounting fees burial fees mechanic fees hotel guest service fees vat on light bills at on telephones and cell services and cable and water and rent..are we there yet/

0

Dawes 6 years ago

They need to increase taxes more so they can employ more people in Government Departments, until we have full employment.

0

seamphony 6 years ago

i'm suspecting the D- average in math has unfortunately infiltrated into the government everyone! no matter how much you tax something, even 100% of ZERO is 0. Nada. Zip.

0

Sign in to comment