0

Insurance ensures 'no fiscal risk' from PLP mortgage plan

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

A LEADING architect of the Progressive Liberal Party's (PLP) mortgage relief plan is arguing that its so-called $105 million 'funding gap' would be covered by insurance, ensuring the Bahamas' "national financial position is not put at risk".

photo

Franklyn Wilson

Responding rapidly to criticism voiced by Bahamian commercial banking industry executives, Franklyn Wilson, chairman of Arawak Homes, told Tribune Business that "any way you skin the cat", it was possible to insure the potential financial exposure created by the gap between the proposed government guarantee and funds raised from a levy on homeowner participants.

Insisting that the PLP plan "makes sense for the country", and calling on Bahamians to forget "partisan politics" and the impending general election, Mr Wilson said London-based insurance executives had told him it was possible to purchase insurance that would cover the government guarantee - thereby limiting any potential exposure for the Public Treasury.

Mr Wilson, who is also the chairman of RoyalStar Assurance, even forwarded Tribune Business an e-mail exchange between himself and the Bahamian general insurer's managing director, Steve Watson, to back-up his assertion.

In the e-mail, Mr Watson wrote: "As discussed, I believe that given the maximum exposure and self-retention can be clearly determined, it should be possible to find a solution either within the conventional insurance market or the capital markets, subject, of course, to an adequate premium being charged.

"It will, however, be necessary to obtain very high resolution data to allow the relevant actuarial work to be carried out."

Mr Wilson, for his part, told Tribune Business: "We are talking about an insurable product. You end up with, under the guarantee, with certain losses under certain circumstances which contacts told you leave the funding gap at $100 million.

"The fact anyone can do that calculation is saying the risk is identifiable and, two, measurable. Any risk that is identifiable and measurable is insurable. If you can identify and measure it, more often than not you can insure it. You can go to the insurance market if the risk can be defined."

The Arawak Homes chairman added that under the proposed PLP plan, the Government - after doing the necessary actuarial projections and studies - would be able to go to the global insurance markets knowing the maximum value of what they wanted to insure under the guarantee.

"The first thing the market says is how much deductible are you willing to pay," Mr Wilson said. "The higher the deductible, the lower the premium. It's for the Minister of Finance to make a judgment as to how much liability he is prepared to take on, and how much he is prepared to lay-off."

If the Government chose to pay a 10 per cent deductible, as per Mr Wilson's suggestion and the $105 million 'funding gap' calculation, it would be exposed to a $10.5 million loss in a worst-case scenario, with insurance covering the rest. A 20 per cent deductible would leave the Government with a $21 million potential exposure.

"The point I'm making is, any way you skin the cat, you're not talking about a quantum of money that puts the national financial position at risk, because it's insurable," Mr Wilson told Tribune Business.

"The amount of premium will be influenced, no doubt, by the insurer's sense of how soon the job market will expand. If you believe the economy is going to grow, more of those people who are delinquent on their loans will be able to bring themselves current or change their circumstances.

"Implicit in that is if people in these distressed properties will reduce in number, the $100 million only arises if there's no growth."

And, taking on fears that the PLP proposal would result in 'moral hazard', encouraging people to believe that the Government would cover their backs if they defaulted on their mortgages, Mr Wilson said he felt such sentiments had a "political bias" to them.

He pointed out that the Ingraham administration had already intervened in the 'free market' in various ways to help out "distressed" Bahamians, most notably through the various payment plans offered to Bahamas Electricity Corporation (BEC) customers.

In another sign that criticism of the mortgage relief plan has alarmed the PLP and its advisers, another of its 'architects', senior Colina Insurance Company executive Lynden Nairn, told Tribune Business that only delinquent borrowers selected to participate in the scheme would be charged a levy equivalent to 0.5 per cent of their outstanding debt balance.

Noting that "not every single' delinquent borrower, who holds a chunk of the Bahamian banking industry's $450 million pile of non-performing mortgages, would qualify for the proposed scheme, Mr Nairn said the PLP was seeking to work out an arrangement with lenders where plan participants paid a reduced interest rate of Bahamian Prime plus 1 per cent - 5.75 per cent.

This, he argued, would have the advantage of reducing monthly mortgage payments, potentially bringing many borrowers unable to meet a higher sum - at an average 8 per cent interest rate - back into good standing.

"If you have $200 million of mortgages participating in this initiative, you have the banks recognising additional income of $11.5-$12 million per year from this alone," Mr Nairn told Tribune Business.

"It brings relief to thousands of Bahamians, and ensures hundreds of homes are taken off the inventory of homes for sale."

Estimating that there were around 3,000 Bahamian mortgage borrowers in default, and in danger of losing their homes, Mr Nairn said removing the over-supply of distressed properties would lead to buyers eyeing new construction instead of seeking such deals.

This, he added, would boost the construction industry and other sectors reliant on the housing market. In addition, by removing distressed assets from bank portfolio's, Mr Nairn said $50 million of costs would be removed from the industry, boosting their capital and solvency margins, and encouraging renewed lending.

This, in turn, he argued would stimulate sectors such as real estate and attorneys. "With all this increased economic activity, one would expect the Government's revenues to increase," Mr Nairn said.

Noting that the plan was to run for five years, he added that if 9 per cent of borrower participants became delinquent during that period, the net cost to the Government would be "zero".

"If 20 per cent of them defaulted in a five-year period, the net cost would be a maximum of $1.5 million per year," Mr Nairn said. "The increase in government revenues would more than pay for $1.5 million associated with delinquencies. It's a simple plan. It's a win-win for everybody."

Comments

BayStreet 12 years ago

Even though delinquent homeowners affect Mr. Wilson’s business, I expected Mr. Wilson to be more objective in his analysis of this mortgage situation given that he is a highly respected businessman in the Bahamas. When questioned about the ‘moral hazard’ issue, Mr. Wilson stated above that he believes it is one of political bias. I would disagree with him based on the grounds of ‘economic loss’. In defense of the potential moral hazard, Mr. Wilson stated that the FNM government already interfered due to the Payment Plan for customers that were delinquent on with their BEC bills.

If a plan reduces or causes a party to suffer financial loss, this is known as ‘economic loss’. By definition, a payment plan is the rescheduling of when and how much a customer repays what he or she owes to another. The PLP proposes extinguishing a portion the debt owed by delinquent homeowners. The former only reorganizes an individual repays what is owed, while the latter eliminates a portion of what is owed. By implementing a payment plan, the receivable held on the books by the banks would not change. However, under the proposed PLP plan, banks will have to reduce their receivable amounts on their books and record an expense.

In addition, there is an article on CNBC entitled, ‘Debate Rages over Principal forgiveness at Fannie and Freddie’, which quoted the Acting director of FHFA, Ed Demarco, concerns over moral hazard in regards to principal forgiveness, which is similar to the PLP proposal of Interest forgiveness. Mr. Demarco stated,

“One factor that needs to be considered is the borrower incentive effects. That means, will some percentage of borrowers who are current on their loans, be encouraged to either claim a hardship or actually go delinquent to capture the benefits of principal forgiveness?”

Something needs to be done, and a few points proposed by the PLP are valid, however, the proposal does create a moral hazard issue.

0

jeromeolivas 12 years ago

We did just that - cashed out the 529's. Refied to a lower, fixed rate to get out of an ARM check out "Official Refinance" to find lower rates with out entering your SSN!

0

Sign in to comment