0

Gov't targets $100m VAT net revenue rise

photo

Minister of state for finance, Michael Halkitis.

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

The Government is estimating that implementation of a Value-Added Tax (VAT) will generate a $100 million net increase in its annual revenues, Tribune Business was told yesterday, with the new tax generating equivalent to 2 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

Michael Halkitis, minister of state for finance, told Tribune Business the Government was confident VAT would generate “net positive” results for its revenue intake when implemented come the 2014-2015 Budget year.

Asked by this newspaper what impact VAT would have on the Government’s total revenues, Mr Halkitis said: “We have a rough estimate, $100 million more net, conservatively.

“Our goal is to get about 2 per cent [of GDP] when it’s fully implemented.”

The latter figure refers to the gross revenues generated by VAT alone. Given that the Bahamas is estimated to have an annual GDP of around $8 billion, that places monies generated by VAT at around $160 million per annum - a figure Mr Halkitis did not disagree with yesterday when it was put to him by Tribune Business.

The Minister, though, pointed out that much of the detail surrounding a VAT and its implementation had yet to be finalised.

With 16-17 months before the Government’s implementation deadline, much consultation with the Bahamian public and private sector on how the new tax will work has to take place, and Mr Halkitis noted that determining a final list of products/services that would attract a 0 per cent VAT rate still had to be drawn up.

Several accountants, though, had previously expressed concerns to Tribune Business that, based on the information released to-date, VAT’s implementation could be a “net negative” for the Government in terms of its revenues.

This newspaper reported on Monday how the Government’s White Paper proposals to abolish the current Business Licence fee structure and hotel occupancy tax would see it lose $140 million in annual income, based on 2012-2013 Budget projections.

While the Government’s ‘2 per cent of GDP’ VAT estimates would more than make up for this shortfall, accounting industry sources said the new tax would also have to compensate for the reduction in import duties/Excise taxes.

Many of these are set to be reduced in proportion to the burden a VAT would impose, and the Bahamas’ accession to full World Trade Organisation (WTO) membership and entry into other trade agreements imposes further pressure to reduce import tariff rates.

Given this, and the need for the Government to increase its total revenues, some accountants have questioned whether VAT would actually achieve that objective as implementation plans currently stand.

Mr Halkitis dismissed those concerns yesterday, saying of VAT’s outcome: “It will be a net positive, or otherwise we’d be wasting our time. It won’t be net negative.”

He added that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Crown Agent studies would not have recommended the Government implement a VAT if doing so would place it in a worse revenue position.

The Government is projecting it will earn $1.319 billion and $231.555 million, in tax and non-tax revenue, respectively, for a total of $1.551 billion in recurrent revenues for the 2012-2013 Budget year. Based on the Ministry of Finance’s projections, a VAT would hypothetically take that to $1.651 billion - closing the fiscal deficit.

Meanwhile, addressing a seminar organised yesterday by the Government-sponsored venture capital fund, Mr Halkitis said the $50,000 annual turnover threshold, above which Bahamian companies must register to pay VAT, was “not set in stone”.

He added, though, that were the threshold to rise to $100,000 annual turnover, the number of companies required to register would not be much different from the 3,798 at $50,000.

And, responding to concerns that the Government’s July 1, 2014, implementation timeline was “overly aggressive”, Mr Halkitis said Saint Lucia had brought its VAT into operation after just 11 months.

He acknowledged that however long it took to implement VAT, there would “be some kinks to work out”.

Noting that most Bahamian small businesses would fall below the $50,000 threshold, and would only have to register to pay VAT voluntarily, Mr Halkitis said of the benchmark: “That’s not set in stone yet.

“Our initial research is that if you move that up to $100,000, for example, the number in terms of registrants is not much different.

“Excluding every business under $50,000 in total turnover, you get just over 3,000 total registrants. If we moved that up to $100,000, there’s very little change.”

Given that those 3,798 businesses accounted for 98.6 per cent of Bahamian economic activity, Mr Halkitis said the Government would still capture the majority of transactions despite the small number of registrants.

As for the implementation timetable, Mr Halkitis argued that it was a realistic goal, although it could be adjusted as implementation drew nearer.

Noting that it took anywhere from 18 months to three years, on average, to implement a VAT - thus indicating the Government is moving to a more aggressive timetable - the Minister added: “No matter if it’s 18 months or three years, there will be some kinks to work out.

“I believe we can do it, largely because a lot of the hard work has already been done. In St Lucia, they did it in 11 months.”

Mr Halkitis said setting a ‘target date’ gave the Government a concrete goal to hit, adding that it would be impossible to get everyone to agree on an implementation schedule.

But accountant Craig A. ‘Tony’ Gomez, the Baker Tilly Gomez managing partner, told the same seminar he was unsure how the Government would verify companies claiming to earn less than $50,000 in annual turnover were actually doing so.

Indicating that this could cause revenue leakage, he added: “I’m not clear how the Government is going to go about ensuring these people are at $50,000 or less.

“If I’m at $51,250, I’m certainly going to be $49,750, so I fall under the radar.”

Comments

TalRussell 11 years, 2 months ago

Comrade Minister Michael while I look upon you as one of the brightest and nicest of PLP's, you gotta know that there is no way in hell that VAT could possibly generate no $100 million, unless you also place the tax on telephone and electricity bills, property taxes, gasoline for both cars and boats. funerals, driver's licenses and vehicle licensing, doctors, hospital and prescription fees. Even the service repair person that fixes your fridge, stove and car will have to charge and collect the new VAT.

http://tribune242.com/users/photos/20...">http://thetribune.media.clients.ellin..." alt="None">

by TalRussell

0

B_I_D___ 11 years, 2 months ago

Funny...in his previous statements, he says the net result to businesses/hotels would be zero as they would reduce the duty or excise tax. etc in portportion to the VAT...but yet they will see a 100M revenue increase. I can tell you as a business owner, it all gets passed on to the end user...the customers, the stores, etc. Be prepared for a major price hike in your groceries and such.

0

Philosopher_King 11 years, 2 months ago

I am still in the process of gathering accurate relevant facts and case study information on the true benefits, drawbacks and possible unintended consequences of implementing a VAT for The Bahamas. One thing I do know that going about our business as we have the last 40 years will lead to financial disaster eventually. We have a tax system that is so inefficient and patently biased against the lower income earners in our society it should be considered criminal. If left in place successive governments will continue run up ever increasing budgetary deficits attempting to modernize the country’s infrastructure and provide basic services to a growing population. Any credible attempt to address this dysfunctional tax regime we currently have is worth seriously exploring people; not merely shooting it down offhand for personal aggrandizement or cheap political gain. The only people who are advocating keeping the status quo tax system are the oligopolistic local merchant class, extremely wealthy expat residents and foreign investors who benefit the most from having a disproportionate amount of our tax dollars spent on their personal and business interest while enjoying some of the lowest effective tax rates available globally.

0

proudloudandfnm 11 years, 2 months ago

NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!! First the government needs to clean and improve collections of current taxes, then our government must get spending under control, we have too much waste. Time to get real about the number of government employees, time to cut back and assign more tasks to employees, time to demand production. Time to end lifetime job security in government. If you dont produce you lose your job, period. Sell 49% of more of our money sucking corporations, leaves us with just revenue, no more to do with the operation just collect. I will not pay more taxes with companies like ZNS or Bahamasair sucking our money, especially since they are not needed. Start prosecuting corporate crimes, a business license in this country is a license to steal, Jackson Ritchie proved that.

NO VAT IN THE BAHAMAS!!!!!

0

Philosopher_King 11 years, 2 months ago

Here we go again the tribal FNM/PLP warriors shooting down anything purposed by their political enemies before even when their party was purposing the exact same thing when they were in power. Sir/Madame please leave this debate alone if you can’t purpose realistic solutions not just spout knee jerk responses. Even though it use to be kept very quite prior to the Ritchie debacle almost every major and minor business in the country with few exceptions has been caught circumventing paying full customs duties to increase their profits or just plain survive. Do you really believe that merely tightening up enforcement will do anything other than give us a short term spike in fines and revenue collected. This will be followed by larger oligopolistic/monopolistic businesses implementing astronomical price increases for their goods and services as the real cost of additional duties and fines are passed on to consumers to pay for the negative effects on their bottom lines. Those smaller to medium size businesses who are mostly already on a financial respirator will collapse and go under with weight of new cost of duties and/or fines they can’t afford to pass on. Finally the long term results will be higher cost of living for everyone, lower business activity and thus lower tax base and increased unemployment no net gain. I too do believe we need to reduce cost at the quasi-government corporation and agencies, but whole sale fire sales, draconian austerity cuts and employee downsizing with no private sector spending or jobs to fill the gap would lead to economic chaos. Let’s stay focus on really fixing a broken unjust custom duty and oppressive fee based tax system first.

0

Sign in to comment