0

Concern over possible delay for referendum

photo

Retired Justice Ruby Nottage

By KHRISNA VIRGIL

Tribune Staff Reporter

kvirgil@tribunemedia.net

RETIRED Justice Ruby Nottage, organiser of the Christie administration’s constitutional referendum education campaign, said the delay of the Parliamentary vote on the proposed equality Bills is “concerning” and leaves only “a short window” to clear up points of confusion before the vote.

However, Mrs Nottage yesterday told reporters that she remained hopeful that the November 6 referendum will not be delayed.

Since the anticipated vote in the House of Assembly was put off last Monday, Mrs Nottage said the education committee has not had any indication of when members of Parliament will vote on the package of Bills. But by her own estimation, Mrs Nottage said, the vote could possibly happen after the education committee meets with the Bahamas Christian Council next week.

In the meantime, she said officials were continuing to meet with stakeholders and non-government organisations. The consultations are to continue in the weeks to come, although Mrs Nottage admitted that the education campaign is still not in full gear, with only 69 days until votes are expected to be cast.

“I am realistic,” Mrs Nottage said, “because I know that persons don’t want to vote on anything that they are not clear about and that is right.

“The November 6 date is coming on us fast and we still haven’t had the Bills move through the House and so that bothers me. It concerns me because it leaves such a short window for us to really try to open up and make clear what the Bills say. So to that extent I think it is a very short window, but it’s doable.  It’s doable with a total concentration not only of politicians, political parties in their own way, the church and our public education committee of the (Constitutional) Commission.”

Some observers have called on the government to delay the vote, to ensure that there is political unanimity and proper education. However, Mrs Nottage said if the November 6 date is put off, the controversial process may not be addressed any time soon.

“There  is still room for the argument ‘take your time’. I have heard that,” she said. “My fear there is if we take too much time it gets put on the back burner and it may never ever be brought forward again. We have this opportunity the momentum is building and I feel energised.”

Last week, Leader of Government Business in the House of Assembly Dr Bernard Nottage said that while the Parliamentary vote was postponed it was with a view to avoid a return to the Bills prematurely only to be forced to make additional changes later.

At the time he said: “We don’t want to have to come back to do the same thing. It is in our interest to wait to see the results of ongoing consultation in light of the fact that further recommendations may be made with respect to the Bills.”

The House of Assembly meets next Wednesday when the Gaming Bill is expected to be tabled.

Comments

Well_mudda_take_sic 9 years, 7 months ago

WELL WORTH REPEATING: The reproductive organs of a man and a woman were created or have evolved the way that they are for good functional and purposeful reasons; hence their well designed meaningful fit to one another is about as natural a thing as one will ever find anywhere in nature. The misuse of these organs is about as unnatural a misfit as one can possibly conjure up and by every standard of decency runs counter to or afoul of nature's own natural order of things. As for our body's waste disposal system, it is fully intended by design to be just that, and nothing more! Church leaders and decent God fearing Bahamians must implore Government to take an unequivocal stance in having marriage clearly defined in our constitution as a sacred union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all other combinations of a union whether it be man and man, woman and woman, man and animal or woman and animal. The proposed legislation and related referendum questions as currently worded leave the door wide open to same-sex marriages and therefore should not be supported under any circumstance. VOTE NO YOURSELF AND TELL MANY OTHERS WHY THEY TOO MUST VOTE NO IN THE UPCOMING REFERENDUM!

0

John 9 years, 7 months ago

UNDER THE CURRENT environment (climate) the referendum will be DEFEATED!!! SIMPLY the Bahamian electorate does not trust this government. Are they using equality for Bahamian women to advance the rights of GAYS and Gay marriage? Go to Freeport (known as the gay capitol of the Bahamas) and find out. Thas where they (gays lesbians and them who aint sure) are right now as we speak. They want more rights for their perverted lifestyle than a normal (sexual) male or female has. V OTE NO ON 4.. Bahamian women have more rights under the law as it is now than passing laws that may allow for some man who may (and can) cause them to loose their spouse to another male..VOTE HELL NO ON 4!!! It is external forces that are trying to force us to change our law and force their hidden agenda on this country VOTE NO! Keep sissying in the closet!

0

killemwitdakno 9 years, 7 months ago

Freeport is not the gay capital of the Bahamas. Some gays moved to Freeport because because of all the crimes against them that apparently barely gets reported. Freeport isn't as backward as Nassau. They're not going to give a shit about how homos or heteros use their own waste system. Who really worries about someone else's a-hole enough to cause a ruckus to the referendum. go get concerned about female genital circumcision in Africa. live in Uganda if you want all the gays killed. This referendum has nothing to do with homosexuality. quit hijacking.

1

Well_mudda_take_sic 9 years, 7 months ago

You are absolutely justified in comparing the gay lifestyle to all of these other perverted evil things going on in our world today. This is why we must fight hard to keep same-sex marriage out of our Christian culture. Christianity in our society is being assaulted by so many other things like corrupt politicians, illegal web shops, crime, etc. etc. Last thing we need to do is to add same-sex marriage to the list of things tearing down the love and respect most Bahamians have for their Christian faith.

0

John 9 years, 7 months ago

The point is that if two men or two women want to live together that is already their right and their business. The problem comes in when they want this to be recognized as God's holy marriage and want it to take place in Gods holy church. If you see nothing wrong with same sex marriage then let everryone drive on the same side of the road for a day.

0

Sickened 9 years, 7 months ago

I just had a thought. After the constitution is amended, will I (a male) be able to enter the Miss Bahamas pageant? Can I also use the ladies bathroom without getting arrested? Will the women in prison share cells with the men? Will I be able to play in the women's sport's leagues? Equal rights is a bit stupid when you think about it.

0

EasternGate 9 years, 7 months ago

McQueeney and Nottage are being dishonest. They have a horse in the race. They are obediently following the directives of the PLP. 90% of Bahamians want the Privy Council replaced as our final court of appeal, but Perry wants to keep them. Consequently, they deliberately avoided that question. This Government is corrupt and incompetent to the core, but Committee members refuse to condemn them. Yet they can fix their "lying mouth" to call us backwards because we will not be deceived by question 4, which is a Trojan Horse for the Gay Agenda

0

Sign in to comment