By KHRISNA VIRGIL
Tribune Staff Reporter
kvirgil@tribunemedia.net
IN view of the concerns raised over the government’s recent Immigration stops, a well known lawyer is advising Bahamians and legal residents to carry documents that will confirm their status.
According to Christina Galanos, immigration officers do have the power to arrest a person who is not a citizen of the Bahamas or a person who is not a permanent resident if it is reasonably suspected that they have committed an offence of the Immigration Act.
She was speaking in reference to the law that gives officials the right to interrogate any person who is not a citizen or a permanent resident. Such persons, said Section 8 of the Act, are defined as desiring to enter or leave the Bahamas, are in the Bahamas and suspected of entering illegally, were granted a leave for a certain time, but remained in the country or is believed to have been working illegally.
“Based on the Act,” Ms Galanos said, “it does not appear as if immigration officers have the power to arrest Bahamian citizens and those that are permanent residents. Technically it would be an unlawful arrest.
“(But for all others) the concept of reasonable suspicion is pretty wide. In essence, these matters are similar to criminal matters where police may arrest an individual if there is reasonable suspicion the person committed an offence. In such a circumstance, it is not required that an individual actually commits an offence.”
Once arrested Ms Galanos stressed that there is a certain period of time within which to decide whether or not the individual is to be charged or released.
“Immigration officers must respect the rights of individuals who are in custody. They must inform them of why they are arrested, they must give them an opportunity to have private communication with an attorney, they must determine whether they have any medical conditions, they must be allowed use of the restroom, they must be fed and they should not be tortured.”
She added: “Section 9 of the Act makes it clear that immigration officers have the power to secure the ends of justice. If the officer reasonably suspects that a person has entered illegally then that officer does have the power to arrest the said person on the spot with a warrant.
“My advice to all Bahamian citizens and all foreigners who are here legally is to walk with some form of identification that confirms their status.”
Comments
ThisIsOurs 10 years, 3 months ago
Hmmm..."reasonable"...he would have been dressed for work, driving in a direction that would have led him to his place of employment, no doubt he had a phone that he could use to call someone at his work...would a reasonable person given all those details assume he was on the island illegally? Black or white would it have been a reasonable assumption....
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
Power tripping...
spoitier 10 years, 3 months ago
Calling someone at his job doesn't prove unless that person have documentation to vouch for him.
ThisIsOurs 10 years, 3 months ago
Nah, I want them to do their job. But I want them to do it sensibly.
My thing is not that white should be treated one way and black the next. And I've been consistent about that. I've said numerous times, treat everyone, irrespective of status (and colour), as you would want to be treated.
When the govt decided to do their job and evict everyone from the Carmichael road shanty town, I agreed that they had to do it, but that it should be done humanely.
The officer in this case probably acted just like our young men typically do, you dissin me? Ok, I guh escalate from 0 to 100 in 1 second
Wasn't necessary. Especially in his profession. His training, same as for police officers, should specifically cover de-escalating explosive situations.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
Let's have them please quote the legal paragraph in the Immigration Law books saying that the proof of Immigration status must be carried with you at all times. Pray tell...what do they do with all the tourists on the beach...are they in their bikini's running around with the pink slip from Immigration to prove they are a tourist? What's to stop an immigration officer hauling them off the beach because they have no papers...who knows, they may in fact be here illegally and just enjoying a day off, very easy jut to say I am a tourist. What about Citizens of the country...give me the actual legal paragraph in any Immigration law, or the constitution that tells me I must carry ID...let alone ID that shows my status as a citizen...then I will shut up. So...let's play devils advocate...I am a Bahamian citizen, I state that fact, they don't believe me and arrest me...according to the very same laws that Galanos quotes, they can't touch me or arrest me. What happens then?
nationbuilder 10 years, 3 months ago
there is no law to quote because such a thing is illegal if demanded of bahamians moving about freely in their own country.
ThisIsOurs 10 years, 3 months ago
That's a hilarious thought...cordone off the beach and demand to see all visas:)
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
As silly an non-sensical as that sounds, according to Fred Mitchell and the Immigration Department, they are perfectly in their right and logic to do just that. Go pluck some scuba divers off of a dive site and demand proof that they are allowed to be in the country. That whole commons sense things just keeps coming up and biting them in their apparent lack of a&$.
Thinker 10 years, 3 months ago
There is a general negative energy in the air that I find this government is openly encouraging. VAT, plans of additional increases in this new taxation regime, violent crime, and yes, slipups at border-patrol, all are evidence of a government out of control. When the citizen must pay for government incompetence, the citizen will reevaluate where their life will be more meaningful.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
When the citizen gets wrongfully detained by the government that is elected by said citizens because they feel they are above the law (Government)...that government is very quickly disposed of.
Honestman 10 years, 3 months ago
This administration KNOWS it has only three more years left and that is what makes it even more dangerous.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
Yeap...the letter to the editor about the the luncheon speech just reiterates that. They know they have lost the support and backing of the masses so they are just going to barge on ahead and do anything they want regardless because no one can stop them. He's willing to use any resources at his fingertips to accomplish his missions, no matter how misguided they are.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
Not necessarily saying the FNM has a chance, and if they did it would only be after a MAJOR reshuffle and campaign shift...I've voted FNM for years...I would not vote for them in their current state...but, on the same hand, the PLP CANNOT get voted back in to carry on this train wreck of governance. I just hope when the time comes, there is a good viable alternative to the PLP.
Thinker 10 years, 3 months ago
NEWSFLASH: all three parties are worthless! Listen to Mr.DNA - his ideas on crime "prevention" are as backwards as this administrations are. We need a Libertarian party, desperately.
Thinker 10 years, 3 months ago
My Lord I heard that Ingraham is going to "lead" FNM again? Please tell me that's a joke.
nationbuilder 10 years, 3 months ago
no official has the legal right to demand that a bahamian prove that he or she is a bahamian on random stops, roadblocks or such activities. bahamians are free to move about in their own country. the government is breaking the law and violating the rights of bahamians if it tries to insist they must carry a passport or birth certificate with them at all times to prove they are bahamian in their own country. immigration officers have no jurisdiction over bahamians in this respect. stop violating our rights is what bahamians need to demand
TalRussell 10 years, 3 months ago
Tis better in custody in Bahamaland. Work permit holders, residents and our tourists must be breathing a sign of relief knowing as they try to freely move in and about our tiny Nassau Town, if stopped in a joint police/immigration road block and detained, they have now been promised under we laws, that they they can indeed request the use of the bathroom, that they will not be starved and no need to worry they will be tortured. No promises have been given ya toilet is go'in flush your stuff down the pipes.
GrassRoot 10 years, 3 months ago
hey how about that all tourists and foreign work permit holders have to wear a yellow jacket all the time? Would make work easier for immigration officers. Proven concept from the past.
The_Oracle 10 years, 3 months ago
The degree to which a government will undermine the rule of law, is limited only by the will of the people who elected them in the first place. Undoing the structures of a decent law abiding society only empowers those who would rule, and undermines personal freedoms that have taken centuries to develop, across many cultures and societies. What is being destroyed is beyond their ability to create.
TalRussell 10 years, 3 months ago
My Dear Comrades how confused I become most of the time I be reading the Tribune's hereto, hereunto and hereinafter confusing posts on the law, when i see the same names posting who, whilst upset with the recklessness of how our laws are either carried out or are not being adhered to, have no reluctance with these same law and justice enforcement officials and broken systems, being responsible for sending ya backsides to hang until ya is dead, dead, dead. Why hasn't the mainstream media not told the ugly "untold story" of the innocent lives who have been hooded and marched to the trap door to be executed right here in our own tiny Bahamaland, all in the name of the sate? The state is YOU and ME.
GrassRoot 10 years, 3 months ago
So Missis Lawyer, we are back to racial profiling. right? Who looks Bahamian and who does not. Well don't get me wrong, it can cut both ways, if white illegals are mistaken for tourists.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
OK...cool...let's pull that paragraph apart...very interesting...
(b) refuses or fails to answer fully and truthfully any question or enquiry lawfully put to him in the course of interrogation under the provisions of paragraph (c) of section 8(1);
In this guys case...did he refuse or answer any questions untruthfully...pretty certain he would have answered every question with 100% truth...are you employed...YES...do you have a work permit...YES...do you have your permit on you...NO...that's not a lie, that is being truthful.
or (c) gives any answer which he knows or has reasonable cause to believe to be false or misleading to any such question or inquiry , as aforesaid;
Same again...would any of what he said be false or misleading??
or (d) when required to produce any document under the provisions of section 8(2), refuses or fails to produce within a reasonable time any such document which it is in his power to produce, or, with the intention of misleading any Immigration Officer produces any document which he knows or has reasonable cause to believe to be false or misleading; or (e) otherwise knowingly misleads or attempts to mislead any Immigration Officer acting under the provisions of paragraph (c) of section 8(1) or section 8(2).
Pray tell...what exactly is 'reasonable time...30 seconds? "refuses or fails to produce within a reasonable time any such document which it is in his power to produce"
There is still NOWHERE in there that says as anyone...citizen, permanent resident, permit holder MUST CARRY their papers showing status on them at all times. Give me the paragraph that says it...'Persons on a work permit are required by law to carry their permit and government issued ID on them at all times'...
Where is it?
They should also better define 'reasonable time' in there as well while they are at it.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
You can be irritated and still be truthful...not a hard concept...pretty certain everything he said would be factual...even if he was irritated and pissed off. You are very quick to not touch my other points in the breakdown of the paragraph though...and where in there it says you MUST carry your documents...all it says is you need to present them within a reasonable time...does not say it must be on his person at all times. There is a BIG difference.
Tarzan 10 years, 3 months ago
“My advice to all Bahamian citizens and all foreigners who are here legally is to walk with some form of identification that confirms their status.”
What form of identification is acceptable for such purposes? Is a valid Bahamian Drivers License adequate?
It would be of great use to the law abiding public if the Tribune could ascertain what forms of documentation the Immigration officers will accept in these random stops.
Thinker 10 years, 3 months ago
Soon, they will have you pay for a new card to prove who you are. Gubment are so smart!
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
For Rory and others to comment on.
Let's remove our Swiss banker from the equation here and strip this down to basics. Rory for arguments sake is not a citizen but someone on a work permit, he just came back from a business trip and his work permit is in his passport which is in his briefcase which is at his office. He goes out for lunch and forgets his permit is on his desk and gets pulled over at an immigration stop. He is nicely dressed, and driving the company car. Immigration asked what his status is and Rory very nicely and humbly says he is here on a work permit and he works as one of the top managers at Atlantis. Immigration asks to see the work permit...Rory then realizes that he left it on his desk...again, he very politely informs immigration that he's an idiot, and he forgot it was in his passport sitting on his desk, and apologizes profusely for the slip up. Immigration then very politely ask him to exit his vehicle guide him gently into the waiting bus and escort him out to Carmicheal Road for processing.
I STILL have a problem with the law paragraph that is quoted. You were truthful, you were polite, there was no reason for them to doubt that you were who you said you were, you said you work for Atlantis and you are driving a vehicle registered to Atlantis.
There is no law saying you MUST be carrying your permit on you 100% 24 hours a day...and according to the quoted law, you are given a 'reasonable amount of time' to present your paperwork.
That is where the problem presents itself...maybe the government needs to revise the law, which is no small feat, and reword a few things, but as it stands now, unless they consider 'reasonable amount of time' 2 seconds, they are breaking their own laws.
Flip the coin, let's say I am a citizen, again, there is no law saying I must carry any proof. I get pulled over, politely inform them of my name and say I am a citizen of this country, which is truthful, they decide to haul me away anyways because I have no proof on me. In t hat case they are in DIRECT violation of the law as they cannot touch me or detain me.
It's a very tricky situation, but they need to be careful in that they are not following the letter of the law...they are making up their own little guidelines (which are NOT LAWS) as they go along, which are in direct conflict with the law itself.
I'm surprised that people have such a tough time grasping this concept.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
Not paranoia my friend...the law...I'm not saying the law is necessarily right, it needs to be changed, that is obvious...but you can't just ignore what is written in black and white to suit your needs...that's my argument. Sadly though, until the law is changed, there are laws being broken by the very same people who are meant to be enforcing them. Again...you are neglecting to really digest what that paragraph you so rightly quoted is all about and break it down properly. The problem with it is it's vagueness. Leaves too much room for interpretation. Is the person telling the truth or trying to be deceitful, what is a reasonable time to present your paperwork when the law does not require it to be carried...except for maybe some 'suggestion' in a guideline somewhere (that is not law) that maybe you should. Don't know the banker in question at all, he could be a complete arse and deserve a block check by someone in authority, but if you are going to do these massive road checks, you need the LEGAL authority to do what they are doing, and they do not have that...they are taking liberties and hoping people just think the immigration officer is acting within the boundaries of the law. I have not read every law in this country and don't claim to make myself an expert, but this whole episode, and you even quoting paragraphs really opens ones eyes to just how much the written law can and is ignored and circumvented...ever day, and not just by Immigration officers of course...just saying.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
Absolutely 100% agree with the fact our laws are archaic and need updating, and every politician for the past 40 years is to blame for not having the cajones to ammend those laws and bring them current. Maybe it is too much like work for them to go down that path...which opens up a whole new can of worms about the great Bahamian work ethic...but I digress...LOL Sadly, we do need a government, neither of the two big ones are worth a crap just now, and none of the small ones are developed enough to take on the task of actually running the country effectively, despite their good intentions. It's a lose lose situation all around. The Bahamas will continue it's downward spiral and we will wallow in our own self made crap until something dramatic happens and a new form and mindset to governance comes to bear.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
Making the Immigration officer the judge and jury of your truthfulness just leaves the door wide open for abuse...from both sides, the Immigration officer may be having a bad day, and yer screwed no matter what, you could be the smootest talker and most convincing, but lying through your teeth and get by, you could be having a bad day, be a bit grumpy, but telling the truth and get hauled off. If you are going to make it so that the work permit is the be all and end all of proving you are telling the truth, then you have to remove all that crap in there about ("refuses or fails to answer fully and truthfully any question or enquiry lawfully put to him in the course of interrogation under the provisions of paragraph (c) of section 8(1); or (c) gives any answer which he knows or has reasonable cause to believe to be false or misleading to any such question or inquiry") , and change it so t hat it says something like...the Immigration officer cannot decide on his own free will that you are being truthful in your statement, the sole evidence of your being of legal status is your government issued photo ID along with your Work Permit to reside. These documents must be on your person at all times while you move within the country. But until such verbage is used, it leaves the door open to abuse and to the Immigration officers taking liberties and breaking the laws of this country. Putting that spin back on the Citizens and Permanent Resides makes it that much more difficult. Is that just an Immigration Law thing, or does that become more constitutional...I am not too sure.
Thinker 10 years, 3 months ago
You see, majority does not "rule" me.
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
I sure hope immigration is out there stopping them and asking them for their immigration documents...maybe they should start the marathon from the detention centre...
B_I_D___ 10 years, 3 months ago
Afterall...I can guarantee 100% that there are residents on a work permit running in that race that will not have their work permits on them...now is a perfect time to round up those trouble makers and prove to them who is really in charge!!
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID