0

BOB ‘boggles mind’ with 46% bad loans

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

More than 46 per cent of Bank of the Bahamas’ $510 million loan portfolio is now impaired, with ‘bad’ credit extended to business customers exceeding the sum that remains current.

The BISX-listed institution’s long-suffering shareholders yesterday told Tribune Business that its latest travails, disclosed in the annual results for the year to end-June 2016, “boggle the mind”.

The financials, signed off by its Board of Directors on December 13 after they obtained a three-month extension to publication from BISX and the Securities Commission, provide further insights into the depth of its woes and the extent to which the Government (via the Bahamian taxpayer) continues to prop it up and prevent its collapse.

Among the highlights are:

  • The 10.5 per cent year-over-year decline in Bank of the Bahamas’ net loan portfolio, from $569.411 million to $509.884 million, resulted in the proportion of non-accrual loans (those that are non-performing/impaired) jumping by almost five percentage points.

Non-accrual loans rose from 41.27 per cent of the total portfolio to 46.07 per cent at end-June 2016, even though the total sum involved - $234.886 million - was largely flat with the 2015 numbers.

However, the figures again show that unless more non-performing loans are removed from Bank of the Bahamas’ balance sheet, its prospects of recovery and a return to sustained profitability remain slim.

Impaired commercial loans, worth $92.869 million at year-end 2016, exceed $70.98 million in ‘good credit’ extended to business borrowers by almost $22 million.

The annual financials also reveal that Bank of the Bahamas has “termed out” some $38 million worth of overdrafts, which means that it has capitalised these short-term debts to convert them into long-term liabilities.

“During June 2016, the bank termed out certain non-performing overdrafts to non-performing mortgage, commercial or consumer loans amounting to $38 million,” the statements said.

  • Deposits by the Government and its agencies accounted for 52.8 per cent, or more than half, Bank of the Bahamas’ total deposits at the June 30, 2016, year-end.

The Christie administration’s deposits at the BISX-listed institution jumped by 27.6 per cent or more than $87.4 million year-over-year, hitting $403.932 million compared to $316.503 million in 2015.

This provides further evidence of just how heavily the Government is propping up Bank of the Bahamas, directing its agencies to deposit monies with it, and requiring new public sector hires to open accounts there.

Bank of the Bahamas’ total deposits also grew year-over-year during its 2016 financial year, expanding by $67 million or 9.6 per cent to $764.353 million (they subsequently declined after year-end).

This shows that without the Government increasing its deposits, Bank of the Bahamas’ would have suffered a full-year decline in this indicator, as private clients again withdrew more than they put in.

  • Bank of the Bahamas was non-compliant with four of its five key regulatory capital ratios at end-June 2016, the annual financials revealing that the Central Bank of the Bahamas has made “certain supervisory interventions” with it.

The nature of these “interventions” was not revealed, but on September 30, 2016, the Central Bank increased one of its key regulatory capital ratios beyond the norm specifically for Bank of the Bahamas.

“The Central Bank is aware of these regulatory deficiencies, and has imposed certain supervisory interventions on the bank. The bank continues to report to the Central Bank on its progress,” Bank of the Bahamas’ annual financial statements state.

“Effective September 30, 2016, the Central Bank increased the minimum capital requirement for the ratio on Total Capital to Total Risk Weighted Assets to 18 per cent for the bank. “

The standard for this ratio is 17 per cent, meaning that Bank of the Bahamas must now hit a standard that is one percentage point higher than the industry norm. Its $40 million rights issue, which was “entirely” taken up by the Public Treasury, was intended to bring all the bank’s capital ratios into line with the Central Bank’s requirements - at least for the moment.

  • Bank of the Bahamas’ external auditors, KPMG, in their first year on the job did not qualify their audit opinion, seemingly on the basis of the Government’s continued financial support.

However, it did flag up its ‘going concern’ note and the BISX-listed institution’s problems in meeting the Central Bank’s regulatory capital requirements.

“The bank has experienced continuing operating losses for the last several years, and was also non-compliant with certain of its externally imposed regulatory capital requirements as at June 30, 2016, and 2015,” KPMG noted.

“Management does not expect that the continued operating losses or regulatory capital deficiencies will impact the bank’s continuing ability to operate as a going concern.”

Acknowledging the bank’s $94.004 million accumulated deficit at end-June 2016, KPMG referred to both its Board-approved ‘strategic plan’ and the Government’s continued support as the basis for its ‘non-qualification’, although it appeared uncertain as to how long the latter will last.

“Management has developed a strategic plan intended to improve the operations and financial viability of the bank, and does not expect that the continued operating losses or regulatory capital deficiencies will impact the bank’s continuing ability to operate as a going concern,” the annual financial statements said.

“The Government, as majority shareholder, has confirmed that it remains firmly committed to supporting the continuing operations of the bank, including the implementation of the strategic plan approved by the Board to address these deficiencies, and will ensure that adequate resources are provided to enable the bank to satisfy its financial obligations and its regulatory capital requirements for at least the next twelve months and, in fact, for the foreseeable future.”

Bank of the Bahamas has yet to release, or discuss, its “strategic plan” with the 3,000 minority investors who now hold just over 20 per cent of its equity.

While its $23.407 million net loss was in line with the unaudited estimate contained in its $40 million rights offering prospectus, shareholders were quick to vent their concerns yesterday.

Mike Lightbourn, the outspoken president of Coldwell Banker Lightbourn Realty, told Tribune Business of the bank’s performance: “It boggles the mind.

“What it is, is a farce. It’s a disgrace and a joke. Anywhere else in the world, the bloody bank would be closed.”

Dionisio D’Aguilar, the FNM candidate for Montagu, told Tribune Business that the Government had “no choice” but to stand behind Bank of the Bahamas, given that the consequences for the economy and its depositor would be far worse should it fail.

“It’s a government bail-out to the tune of millions of dollars a year,” he told Tribune Business, adding that the 46 per cent of loans that were impaired was “a pretty poor reflection on what management did”.

“Their loan policies were pretty slack,” Mr D’Aguilar added. “It would be interesting to see how many were of a political nature. It didn’t go to me. I didn’t get a penny.”

The Bank of the Bahamas financial statements also disclose that the Bahamian taxpayer is now ‘on the hook’ for the $45.2 million worth of loans transferred to Bahamas Resolve, the Government’s special purpose vehicle (SPV).

Should Bahamas Resolve fail to recover the loans it has received, and finance the interest payments due on the $100 million in government bonds used to fill the hole on Bank of the Bahamas’ balance sheet, the taxpayer will be called into action yet again.

“As a part of the transaction, the bank received an irrevocable Letter of Support from the Government,” the annual financials said.

“The Letter of Support pledged the Government’s support of the SPV to enable it to satisfy its obligations under the notes, and confirms that, in the event of default by the SPV, the bank can seek to recover outstanding balances from the Government.”

An accrued interest receivable of $708,333 was owing to Bank of the Bahamas from Bahamas Resolve at end-June 2016, with the bank now having the ability to redeem all - or part - of the $100 million in bonds.

The Bahamas Resolve ‘bail out’ thus represents a transfer of liabilities from Bank of the Bahamas’ shareholders to the Bahamian taxpayer.

Comments

watcher 7 years, 4 months ago

So it seems that monies go in through the front door via Government employees salaries (who must bank there) and our VAT, NI and other tax money, and immediately out the back door via loans to Christie's cronies, henchmen and lackeys. Surely to goodness there must by now be a moratorium on all new loans and lending at BOB?

You couldn't make this utter nonsense up, yet our Central Bank, Securities Commission and BISX all condone it. I am almost at a loss for further words, because I cannot comprehend how this is not illegal - which it surely would be in any civilised country. What next for Christie - will he tax (steal) all savings accounts not banking with BOB? Damn it - I shouldn't give him ideas..........

0

sheeprunner12 7 years, 4 months ago

This not a bank ............ this is a cronies' money tree (they cut off its limbs with the ripe fruit on it)

0

sheeprunner12 7 years, 4 months ago

This is a bank with the majority of the shares owned by the government (we, the people) ........ the bad debt accounts should be printed for us to see who are these delinquents that are draining our Treasury resources

0

banker 7 years, 4 months ago

The bank is bankrupt and should be wound up. If this situation were in a REAL country, people would go to jail and others would be put into bankruptcy by the courts.

This is why BISX is a joke, and the Central Bank is a joke. They are all puppets of the government, maintaining a charade. Truly a banana republic.

1

bogart 7 years, 4 months ago

Amazing that all the experts, foreign, local, auditors, professionals, senior management, directors, shareholders, Central Bank have not pointed to a cause of the bank falling into this sate of affairs knowing fully well that loans do not go bad all by themselves. Its like saying blame the computer. Year after year after year this bank is examined and no one is found guilty. Loans should be investigated to see why they went bad. If workers did not follow procedures and gave loans that were destined to go bad then they should be punished. SIMPLE do the mathematical analysis to see if the loan was feasible. Look at the TDSR - total debt service ratio the percent of income to repay loan usually 45%. Look at the balance sheet and ask whether it is likely that a performing company or individual should have these figures. Look at the budget analysis and ask whether the income is justified and does it relate to data in the balance sheet. Cross check. Were there extraordinary items causing shortfalls? Ask whether the customer was misled into believing the loan was viable when it was not. Look and see whether escrow conditions were followed. On a national level what is shocking is that out of all the professionals dozens and dozens educated internationally adhering to and signing international global subscribed and recognized international standards that the shortfall of Wells Fargo Bank can be transparently and to the point spelled out with penalties and resignations while no such thing happens locally. More amazing is that Inquiries by leading political groups can be constituted to examine one hotel which did not open by foreigners and one Batelco which was sold to foreigners yet nothing to this extent done to this local bank. Shares have fallen from around $5 to $2 losing tens of millions of dollars. Millions have also been spent to support this bank yet again no faults. We are not operating in a vacuum but connected to many other international institutions facing de-risking and losing correspondent banking relations. We need to have a public investigation and persons if found liable be given jail time. Thousands of shareholders have been affected, many pensions affected, millions of precious dollars redirected to supporting the bank etcetcetc. Investigations are needed and year after year after year this bank continues with articles like this.

1

Alex_Charles 7 years, 4 months ago

If people haven't realized by now, Central Bank must have been complicit for this to carry on for years. But don't worry in typical fashion this administration will create a 'new' regulatory body to work 'alongside' the Central bank' to regulate the industry. They might even hire an external auditor again to disprove the previous audit. Or even better just take the NHI/NIB money and bail the bank out again.

0

The_Oracle 7 years, 4 months ago

BOB has already failed, they're just prolonging the death. Criminal charges aught to be in the headlines.

0

anansi 7 years, 4 months ago

Why should the taxpayers be forced to prop up this bank? This bank should be shut down or sold to the highest bidder asap.

1

BahamaPundit 7 years, 4 months ago

Bested only by the Chinese fishing scandal, the robbing of BOB is the foremost scandal in this nation. It alone should be enough to bring the We March back to the streets. It alone is enough to justify a populous revolution and uprising. Stollen. Hundreds of millions of dollars stollen! Not only has there been a robbery of global proportions -- one of the bigest heists in human history, but the dastardly deed has been cloaked, covered up, hidden by the traitorous, conspiring PLP Government, who have washed it, rubbed it out fraudulently using the Bahamian people's tax money.

0

Sign in to comment