Archbishop Calls For End To Death Penalty

CATHOLIC Archbishop Patrick Pinder, pictured (right) here with Minister of Education Jerome Fitzgerald, has called for the government to abolish the death penalty. (Photo: Tim Clarke)

CATHOLIC Archbishop Patrick Pinder, pictured (right) here with Minister of Education Jerome Fitzgerald, has called for the government to abolish the death penalty. (Photo: Tim Clarke)


Tribune Staff Reporter


ARCHBISHOP Patrick Pinder, of the Catholic Archdiocese, yesterday called for the government to abolish the death penalty and focus instead on offender rehabilitation.

Archbishop Pinder’s remarks came in a joint pastoral statement from the Bishops of the Antilles Episcopal Conference (AEC) in commemoration of the Catholic Church’s Extraordinary Jubilee Year of Mercy. The bishops - 19 of whom are signatories to the document - are urging governments and citizens in the region to abolish capital punishment.

The statement said to take away a person’s “basic right to immunity from fatal harm” is to “compromise his/her sacred dignity”.

It said while a “climate of lawlessness” is prevalent in the Bahamas and the region, capital punishment does not “assist the criminal to reform,” nor does it “assist the victim to restore his or her violated dignity.”

As such, Archbishop Pinder said the Bahamas, as a member of the AEC, along with the AEC’s other regional members, should instead focus on “restorative justice” to bring about true criminal justice reform, which includes addressing the factors that contribute to crime and “strengthening” the capacity of criminal justice systems to address crime and violence.

The last person executed in The Bahamas was David Mitchell in January 2000.

Given the country’s crime woes, many have called for the death penalty to be enforced, in the hope that it would serve as an effective deterrent to criminal activity, particularly for such serious offences as murder.

However, the London-based Privy Council has served as an obstacle to the Bahamas carrying out the death penalty, after ruling in 2006 that the mandatory death sentence for murder was unconstitutional.

“To reject capital punishment is not to make light of the loss of loved ones and the violation of human dignity and rights experienced by victims of crime,” the bishops wrote. “Capital punishment does not assist the criminal to reform, or society to deter. Neither does it assist the victim to restore his or her violated dignity. Only genuine reconciliation can achieve personal satisfaction and restore social order. The process of reconciliation involves conversion, reform, restitution and forgiveness.

“In civil society, penal laws and institutions are necessary because the conditions of reconciliation are not often fully met. But the goal of reconciliation, the restoration of moral order to society, is the purpose of those institutions, and it is the purpose of the Christian practice of forgiveness.”

Archbishop Pinder, along with the other bishops, said the region would be better served addressing the “underlying” causes of criminal activity and to focus on reforming the criminal justice system in their respective countries.

“A restorative justice approach focuses on holding the offender accountable in a more meaningful way and helping to achieve a sense of healing for both the victim(s) and the community; it embraces socialisation, rehabilitation and reconciliation rather than retribution and vengeance,” the statement said. “Restorative justice can help us to achieve our goals. It is not a panacea for all social ills, but can be used effectively together with other policies.

“To promote integral human development in our region, we recognise the urgent need for our governments to address the underlying causes of crime and the risk factors that contribute to crime and not only the symptoms of crime. To do so, they must take into consideration the many challenges to human life today, including poverty and social exclusion, human trafficking, the sex trade, including exploitation of women and children, domestic violence, the drug and gun trade.”

In June 2011, the Privy Council overturned Maxo Tido’s death sentence in connection with the killing of 16-year-old Donnell Connover, whose body was found off Cowpen Road, battered and bruised and her skull crushed. There was additional evidence that parts of her body were burned after her death.

But the Privy Council concluded that the murder was not an example of the “worst of the worst.”

In November 2011, Parliament passed legislation to define the types of murder constituting the “worst of the worst” guidelines set out by the London court.

Despite this, Sean McWeeney, QC, chairman of the Constitutional Reform Commission, doubted whether the changes would matter to the Privy Council.

Speaking on the matter in April 2013 in response to a question raised at the commission’s first town hall meeting, Mr McWeeney said “as long as the Privy Council remains your final court of appeal, it is extremely doubtful that you will ever be able to hang anyone.”


sealice 3 years ago

we haven't hung someone in a while?? What's the point of this story? We need to start hanging people make room in Fox Hill and hopefully scare people out of a life of crime. The same priests that are sleeping with your children want you to let the criminals free?


birdiestrachan 3 years ago

This is the first time and it may be the last time I will ever agree with the Bishop. some Innocent people , and poor people are the ones who are executed and who will perform these executions??. ones case can be as good as their lawyer .or the intelligence of the Jury. It seems as if Fox Hill Prison is hell on earth, and If bought guilty . they should go from the prison to the grave.


licks2 3 years ago

How many poor and innocent who were executed wrongly in this country? I agree that one "innocent" put to death wrongly is one too many.. . .especially if that one happens to be me or someone else in this nation for that matter. . .but your argument is counter productive! Because your are afraid to hang one innocent person. . .everybody and they mar can reek havoc on the society. . .indiscriminate killings of enemies and innocent by-standers anywhere in public and elsewhere? I hope by now that you do see where this is going. . .you are asking that we do not kill persons who are beyond doubt guilty of wantonly taking another life. . .go to prison. . .gets bail. . .kill a few more. . .go back to prison. . .come back on the street. . .kill a few more. . .on and on and on and on!

For a person who loath the idea of taking a "possible" innocent person's life, you really do feel very comfortable with whole sale killing of others persons who are not accused and may be tried in a court of justice for wanton killings of other persons. . .you do need a balance. . .if you can't protect the public from wanton loss of their lives. . .you must find a way to neutralize the wanton killer. . . prison of the grave yard. . .it can ever be neither prison or the grave. . .then you will be condoning the killing of persons who cannot kill to protect themselves nor can they depend on the court and prison to protect them from wanton killers among them!


Sickened 3 years ago

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.


Really___ 3 years ago

AWWWWWW......... someone needs some attention.


Really___ 3 years ago

If you want to see crime drop, hang a good 50. All these damass criminals will be some of the most polite people on da planet. YOU NEXT, BUDDY! YOU NEXT!


Really___ 3 years ago

I know yinna ain't gonna post this, but......... HANG 'UM!


Sign in to comment