0

'PLP started Dillet project - not us'

WORKS Minister Desmond Bannister in the House of Assembly.

WORKS Minister Desmond Bannister in the House of Assembly.

By Rashad Rolle

THE multi-million dollar project to renovate the Stephen Dillet Primary School this summer began without ministerial approval under the former Christie administration, Works Minister Desmond Bannister said yesterday.

He said the Minnis administration brought the matter to Cabinet when it realised this and held accountable the public servants responsible for overstepping their boundaries in the matter.

However, in a statement to The Tribune last night, Official Opposition Leader Philip “Brave” Davis rejected his assertions as “false.”

The back-and-forth is the latest development in the controversy after former Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) Chairman Bradley Roberts claimed Sunday the contract to renovate the school was awarded to Mal Jack Construction without a proper public tendering process. The Free National Movement (FNM), in the lead-up to the May general election and since then, has vowed to be transparent about contract awards and has committed to ensuring tendering process takes place for them.

Mr Roberts, who served as minister of works and utilities in the first Christie administration, claimed Mal Jack Construction should not have received the contract because it had been blacklisted by the Ministry of Works.

Because Cabinet is responsible for approving contracts worth more than $250,000, critics clamored for answers after Mr Bannister told reporters Tuesday the project was not subject to a proper public tendering process.

Mr Roberts released a statement yesterday responding to such remarks.

“A $4 million non-competitive contract requires the approval of Cabinet,” he said.

“As a former Cabinet minister who speaks from experience, no public servant has the audacity to issue a $4 million negotiated contract without the knowledge of the minister; the public service simply does not operate in that manner. Desmond Bannister is clearly misleading the public and breaching the public trust. He kept the public in the dark about this contract and when confronted with the corrupt facts about the same, he conspires to mislead the public by sweeping this entire sordid and scandalous affair under the proverbial carpet; he must not and will not be allowed to get away with it.”

Mr Roberts could not be reached yesterday to respond to Mr Bannister’s new revelation that work began on the primary school under the previous administration.

However, Opposition Leader Phillip “Brave” Davis, the minister of works under the former Christie administration, rejected the charge in a statement to The Tribune.

“We contest the minister’s assertions,” he said. “We reject them as false. A detailed response will come from the Leader of Opposition’s office upon my return to the country. We know that Mal Jack Construction was not hired by the PLP government but under the FNM to do the work at Stephen Dillette. Under the PLP administration no contract would have been issued to Mal Jack given the adverse reports from the Ministry of Works based on previously performed work by Mal Jack in the Ministry’s behalf. We also know that this project was inspected regularly by the Prime Minister himself. So it is the Minister’s own administration that must answer for what has happened.”

Asked outside the House of Assembly yesterday about the project and concerns surrounding it, Mr Bannister told The Tribune: “It’s a project where somebody exceeded his boundaries and the project actually physically started, planned and started without ministerial authority. When that happened, the minister had to act and Cabinet had to act and in those circumstances, we could not leave the school and the children in limbo.”

Asked when the project started, he said: “They started it under the PLP regime. (It) started when the PLP was in power. They obviously were working on it and we were not aware of it. We came to power and met all of this going on and we had to deal with the individuals who were involved.”

Asked why he took responsibility for the problem in an interview with reporters Tuesday even though he says work began on it under the previous administration, he said: “Because whatever happens in my ministry I take responsibility for. Ask Bradley Roberts if he did that once when he was a minister.”

Mr Bannister declined to say what consequences came to those who he said exceeded their boundaries in the matter.

“No I don’t want to do that,” he said. “But the Cabinet is aware and the Prime Minister is aware and we’ve had to do what we had to do.”

The renovation of the Stephen Dillet Primary School is said to have cost the government about $4 million.

Comments

BahamasForBahamians 6 years, 4 months ago

Bannister already admitted corruption on this one.

Its too late to say the PLP did it now. I'm afraid we have PLP V3.0 in this FNM administration.

2

sheeprunner12 6 years, 4 months ago

This school is a white elephant ....... a product of Majority Rule "black power" euphoria.

0

Truism 6 years, 4 months ago

Sir Cecil Wallace-Whitfield legacy, this is. LMAO

0

sealice 6 years, 4 months ago

Why did the PLP bannish Mal Jack? They wouldn't pay the kick backs for the contracts? Mal Jack was to cheap so of course there wasn't room in the contracts for the kick back.... or what else oh wait the business is owned by white bahamians and the PLP can't support that ... no can do, dey can go for dat....

0

TalRussell 6 years, 4 months ago

Comrades! This Imperial Red shirts cabinet weak at the knees when it involves themselves, they posses Samson great strength publicly attacking and lowliness be parading all others. No other group politicians had since Pindling's earliest days a greater opportunity for potential to be used greatly and for good the majority votes of the native people, and yet they need read the full story about Samson's demise. Amen!

0

BahamasForBahamians 6 years, 4 months ago

@Sealice - you must be drinking FNM koolaid.

you have a cabinet minister admitting to corruption, executing a contract without it going to tender and your comment of concern is why the contractor was banned ?

you deserve to be banned from further comments.

0

Truism 6 years, 4 months ago

Mal-Jack was not banned by the PLP, it was banned by the Ministry of Works for shoddy workmanship. The company is owned by Jack Andrews. Bad-Jack. LOL

0

birdiestrachan 6 years, 4 months ago

The PLP always had problems with Mal=Jack. they would not have hired that Company Banister has made quite a few blunders. just as his leader does. perhaps Banister is not well.

0

proudloudandfnm 6 years, 4 months ago

I gotta go with Bannister. Bradley lies for a living.

0

TalRussell 6 years, 4 months ago

Comrade Minister, which is it, if the 'Public is not entitled to the facts,' ya blue suit looks good but underneath is really an empty shell?

0

crawfish 6 years, 4 months ago

Check the books of Bahamas Development Bank and see if Mal Jack ever paid off all of the LARGE loans extended to them. No wonder the MOW blacklisted them.

0

BONEFISH 6 years, 4 months ago

How that company got that contract needs to be investigated and disclosed to the public. That company was banned by the MOW after it messed up the construction of the Garvin Tynes primary School.

0

Sign in to comment