0

Sicknote Stalls Smith Trial

Frank Smith at a previous court appearance.

Frank Smith at a previous court appearance.

By NICO SCAVELLA

Tribune Staff Reporter

nscavella@tribunemedia.net

FORMER Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) Senator Frank’s Smith bribery and extortion trial was yesterday adjourned for almost two months after revelations the virtual complainant would be unavailable to give testimony for several weeks.  

Chief Magistrate Joyann Ferguson-Pratt said based on a letter produced by the Crown from Dr Charles Rahming concerning witness Barbara Hanna, she is “satisfied” that Mrs Hanna would be unable to give testimony for at least six weeks. 

The chief magistrate subsequently adjourned the matter to February 15 for a status hearing.

Smith is facing 15 criminal charges concerning his alleged solicitation of $65,000 in bribes from a woman he is said to have assisted in getting a contract. He is currently out on $50,000 bail.

He was initially arraigned before the Chief Magistrate in July charged with 13 counts of extortion and one count of attempted extortion and bribery.

It is alleged Smith, between April 2016 and April 2017, in respect of his duties as a public officer, demanded and obtained $5,000 per month from Barbara Hanna, knowing he was not lawfully authorised to do so.

He is alleged to have attempted to extort another $5,000 from Mrs Hanna in May of this year.

Concerning the bribery charge, it is alleged he solicited $5,000 a month from Mrs Hanna for aiding her in getting a contract with the Public Hospitals Authority, where he formerly served as chairman.

Smith pleaded not guilty to all of the charges during his initial arraignment.

He is currently on bail.

During a previous court hearing, the chief magistrate said she was “concerned” about Mrs Hanna after the latter suffered an apparent meltdown and expressed frustration over her involvement in the matter.

At the time, Mrs Hanna, while in the witness box, took a seat and remained unresponsive for at least five minutes after repeatedly telling lead defense attorney Keith Knight, QC she did not “feel good” and was too “frustrated” to answer any more of his questions.

This came after she confirmed she was borrowing money from Pouland Limited, a lending company owned by Smith, at the same time she was allegedly making $5,000 monthly payments to the former Public Hospitals Authority (PHA) chairman.

Those payments, she said in a previous hearing, were made to Smith after he approached her within a week of her being awarded a one-year, $500,000 plus contract to clean the Critical Care Block (CCB) at the Princess Margaret Hospital in 2016.

Believing it to be a one-time payment, Mrs Hanna said she obliged and gave him the money. Upon doing so however, she said she was told she had to make monthly payments in the amount of $5,000.

During the last hearing earlier this month however, Mr Knight not only attacked Mrs Hanna’s credibility, but foreshadowed a no-case submission based in part on the allegation that she condemned her own testimony.

The key moment during those proceedings came when Mrs Hanna, without prodding, claimed to have given police documents about Pouland Ltd that the prosecution did not disclose during discovery.

The defence argued the lack of disclosure may mean constitutional provisions on fairness may have been breached. Mr Knight said the prosecution, which he said includes police investigators – were obligated to turn over all documents, no matter their perceived benefit.

The prosecution, after inquiring during a short break whether the documents in question were given to the police, reported that investigators said they were never in receipt of the documents.

Mr Knight thus argued that if the investigators were being truthful, Mrs Hanna’s credibility is destroyed. On the other hand, he said if the documents were in fact shown to police as Mrs Hanna claimed, its lack of disclosure puts the defense at a disadvantage.

Mrs Hanna has admitted taking out two separate loans from Smith’s company, one before she started paying him $5,000 a month and one after she began doing so.

She also admitted during cross examination she called Smith and warned him that he was being targeted, but did not reveal who she meant.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.