By Alicia Wallace
The US has been a major influence on The Bahamas for a long time. Proximity and tourism are not the only reasons.
“Foreign is better” has been a dominant idea for decades. Imported apples are redder, US-based network television is more entertaining and flown-in consultants are more knowledgable.
We’ve grown accustomed to looking elsewhere for what we want, whether it’s because of cost, quality, or status, real or perceived. At the same time, we complain about the side effects of these decisions.
Small businesses are suffering, creatives struggle to secure financial support, unemployment is high, university graduates accept offers elsewhere and the country stagnates on various levels.
We don’t listen to our own experts and our governments engage people from all over the world, paying obscene amounts of money to tell us what we — at least some of us — already know.
We are outraged when we hear about it and not just because of the money. Even while we discredit and ignore our own, we are deeply insulted by even the suggestion that someone who does not live here could know or understand anything about our condition or potential better than us. We are compelled to resist “outsiders”.
Who’s Afraid of the UN?
The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women’s visit to The Bahamas and declaration that marital rape is the most pressing gender-based issue in the country drew vitriolic response.
Dubravka Šimonovic was invited to The Bahamas to make an assessment, particularly in light of our bid for a seat on the UN Human Rights Council. It is her job to objectively look at the country and its laws, engage with civil society and report on her findings.
Ms Šimonovic’s visit was not to force new legislation or amendments and her position does not afford her that right.
Her comments, however, helped to spark a necessary conversation spanning several topics including rape, rape culture, marriage and religion. It was a springboard for organisations and individuals and drew attention to an overlooked issue. No matter how we validate her position or explain her visit, Ms Šimonovic is continually regarded as a UN operative, seeking to control The Bahamas and Bahamians.
Religious beliefs and commitment to the protection of patriarchy certainly influenced the conversation, but so did fear.
Are we so opposed to external influence that we willingly refuse to acknowledge — or outright reject — statements of obvious truth and recommendations of merit? It seems as though nationalism as a principle and pride as a restrictive, selfish value prevent us from participating in the processes necessary for growth and advancement as a country.
Fear of being dominated or losing ourselves convinces us to dig our heels deeper into the mire that is our current and persisting state. Are we so weak that we could be controlled by mere conversation and suggestions of non-Bahamians?
Bullied by Big Brother
The President of the United States reportedly referred to African nations, along with others such as Haiti and El Salvador, as “shithole countries”. A xenophobe and a racist, his sentiments were clear before this incident, but it demands a response.
Governments, organisations and individuals have rebuked his statement and made it clear he is not welcome in their spaces.
CARICOM condemned Trump’s statement, calling it “unenlightened” and “unacceptable”. Since then, the Caribbean People’s Declaration, with 200 signatories, deemed the US president “persona non grata”. It declared he is “not welcome in any territory of the Caribbean” and confirms that any visit will be protested by Caribbean people with “demonstrations designed to prevent President Donald Trump’s entry into any portion of the sovereign territory of our Caribbean region”.
The Bahamas has not made such a statement and, based on social media posts and comments, many believe our silence is necessary. What would it mean to be on the bad side of the US and its president?
We need to spend more time thinking about ourselves in relation to our Caribbean counterparts. We have been comfortable with a self-aggrandising narrative, seeing ourselves as superior to the people of other Caribbean nations.
Our GDP inflates our egos. We are proud of our proximity to the US, pre-clearance and ease of access to the tourist market. We argue about whether or not we are a part of the Caribbean, often failing to acknowledge the shared history that binds us.
In our minds, there is more that separates us from the rest of the Caribbean than connecting us.
Contrary to what many Caribbean people believe and often express, we know we are not American, but in many ways, we aspire to Americanness, and it is often our closeness to American values and ways of life that excites us. We do not want to jeopardise it. That said, when issues of rights and freedoms are raised, opponents are quick to accuse advocates of “bringing American issues here”, so we are only interested in certain parts of Americanness.
This commitment to being US-adjacent — not just geographically — often keeps us silent. While Leader of the Opposition Philip “Brave” Davis criticised the lack of response from the current administration, Minister of Foreign Affairs Darren Henfield would only say The Bahamas is part of CARICOM and “we speak with one voice”, suggesting the CARICOM statement is sufficient. Whether or not we believe cowardice is necessary, this is certainly a shameful silence.
On Friday, January 5, the CARICOM Regional Commission on Marijuana held a town hall meeting to get a sense of the Bahamian public’s opinion on the decriminalisation of marijuana. The announcement of this event was like a loud, piercing alarm for those against decriminalisation.
Without even fully understanding the purpose of the event, furious typing and fast-dialing into radio talk shows ensued. People warned against decriminalisation and all manner of impending doom that would result.
While there may be valid arguments against decriminalisation or, more likely, issues to be considered, accusations against CARICOM were wholly unnecessary and completely inaccurate. Listening to the fearful and the conspiracy theorists among us without seeking accurate information, it would be easy to believe CARICOM is forcing legislative changes on The Bahamas.
That a conversation could scare us is more worrying than being shunned by the US, or the decriminalisation of marijuana.
That we are happy to accept frivolous, seemingly inconsequential imports like clothing and media and determined to reject expertise or even the facilitation of information sessions is cause for concern. We do not have to accept everything — or anything — being offered. We can demand that Bahamians experts are called first. We can have differing points of view.
What we cannot afford is to close ourselves off from the rest of the world, convinced that everyone wants to take something from us or force something upon us. There is nothing wrong with learning from other countries, receiving recommendations from international bodies, or standing in solidarity with sister countries in the face of fascism. These decisions are up to us.
Our fight should not be for restricted access to knowledge, perspective and dialogue, but for seats at the table and participatory governance. We need every engagement opportunity we can get.