0

Morality by consensus is not my way

EDITOR, The Tribune

According to Gallup polls, 4.5% of Americans ‘identify’ as a member of the LGBT community. In Canada (2014) 1.7% claimed membership of the same community. If one were to look at media coverage, the coming out of celebrities, the effort to do away with he/she pronouns, etc, the number of movies and television shows geared toward normalising this lifestyle, one would be convinced that they form the majority. Indeed, their views and values are over represented and thrust upon the vast majority and it is labelled as discriminatory, intolerant or homophobic not to acquiesce to or agree. The simple reality is those in the LGBT community are the only ones who publicly flaunt their sexual preferences, practices and fetishes while demanding the rest of us accept them. They constantly want to sensitise the populace to their concerns while seeing the concerns of others as prejudicial, archaic and simple minded, without concern for the moral and social implications of their lifestyle choices. They cry victimisation when others find their views offensive, but offend the sensibilities of others with reckless indifference. How many people have been stigmatised, businesses and careers destroyed or individuals titled homophobic or worse for not agreeing with LGBT views? Views by the way which have no basis in science.

Studies have shown that some degree of gender confusion is normal for most children as they learn to figure out who they are in the world and more than 80% of these revert to identify with their birth sex without incident. I have always been concerned about the LGBT community targeting vulnerable children who may be confused about their sexual identities, while convincing them they are something they are not and offering them a community within which they can have acceptance. My concerns are not unfounded. A recent article in The Times (April 2019), a UK based newspaper, told of five clinic workers who recently quit a government funded Gender Identity programme as part of the National Health Service (NHS) programme because of experimentation on children as young as three years of age. Many of these children were not properly evaluated to determine if they were ‘transgender’ before being placed on hormone blockers to prevent puberty and being assigned for irreversible cross-sex hormones at age 16.

A transgender person may be highly offended if their preferred pronoun is not used. In other words, calling a man who believes he is a woman, he, might offend that man. Zero consideration is given to the fact that it might offend the speaker to be forced to say something that is so ridiculously contrary to reality. This despite not one scintilla of objective evidence for the existence of a transgender person. Has a transgender person ever been identified solely from skeletal remains or by any lab test? Science can prove a person is a man or woman, has diabetes or cancer or any other host of medical conditions, but can a transgender person prove they are transgender objectively? Do they get to upset societal norms just because they say so? It should be obvious that any person, doctor or organisation which claims that surgery and drugs can change a person’s sex is dishonest and lacking in common sense, but despite that, the propaganda machine rolls on. Goebbels would be proud!

Through various well financed pressure groups and global activism, coupled with organisations like the United Nations, the number of countries that support the LGBT philosophy has increased exponentially over the past 20 years. It is important to understand that increasing acceptance and tolerance of LGBT views and the declassification of homosexuality and transgenderism as mental disorders has nothing to do with advancements in science, but rather in the changing views of professional organisations like the American Psychiatric Association as a result of lobbying from the LGBT community. In other words a mental illness is not classified as a mental illness even though it is a mental illness by definition, for the strategic benefit of one group!

In keeping with the penchant for some Bahamians to eschew everything decent, noble and right, recently an organisation was formed called the Bahamas Association of LGBTI Affairs. The goal of this organisation is to educate and sensitise the public in matters pertaining to LGBTI issues. It seems incredibly presumptuous to assume society at large would want to be propagandised, or rather “educated” about their community, concerns or issues? I suspect that I am not alone in being capable of educating myself about any matter of interest to me.

It used to be that a simple diaper change made the sex or gender of a child clear, but now our progressive, enlightened societies have decided to thrust common sense in the heart with the javelin of LGBT activism with hyper-religious zeal. Indeed, the LGBT movement is the new religion, where the god is self, its altar the suggestible human mind and its mantra is tolerance and acceptance of its views regardless of rationality or the lack thereof. This new morality, it seems, is determined by feelings, consensus and social pressure, not by principles or reason. The more celebrity endorsements and professional organisations support a particular view then the more correct that view is it seems. It is mind-boggling that so many can allow so few, to convince them that the obvious is not true, but that which is contrived is true. It appears common sense is dead.

Much study and reflection of the objective evidence convinces me that LGBT views originate from abnormal and unmanaged thoughts, feelings, desires and behaviours. This is the very definition of mental illness. I will persist in and expect that my views will receive the same consideration and respect that those in the LGBT community expect their views to have. Mental illness is real and those afflicted by it require real help not acceptance or normalisation of their illness. I oppose a new morality by consensus, the old tried and true ways worked perfectly fine, and by the way, the old fashioned way does not experiment upon and destroy vulnerable children!

JB

Nassau,

April 23, 2019.

Comments

hrysippus 4 years, 11 months ago

To a child the world is simple, night or day and no shades of grey. As we mature and gain experience, maybe even wisdom, we find that every few things are simple. The letter writer is espousing a very simple and easy point of view which is never the less wrong for several reasons; one obvious reason is that he totally ignores the hundreds of thousands of people who are born with both sec characteristics, I wonder what explanation for this fact the writer would provide and how they should be classified?

0

joeblow 4 years, 11 months ago

When a person has moral training and lives by those principles they will automatically be better citizens, employees and parents. When a person has not had that training or has had it and chooses not to live by it, they must naturally not be as good parents, employees or citizens. The moral and social decline in societies has not been because of the increase in people living by moral standards, but quite the opposite. To attempt to argue otherwise is foolish. Those lacking in moral values live in the grey zone, ever expanding the boundaries or interpretation of what is right to suit their own selfish purposes. Again, that is unwise.

Now for your other question, people with both primary sex characteristics (male and female sex organs) have a genetic anomaly. For some unknown reason the Y chromosome does not suppress the X chromosome from expressing the female organs. This is different from secondary sexual characteristics which appear during puberty. In most instances only one set of organs are functional so the person can decide with medical personnel what might be the best option for them. It should be clear though that the article in no way refers to this rare subset of people. The vast majority of LGBT people are anatomic males or females with screwed up minds!

0

proudloudandfnm 4 years, 11 months ago

Man another person's sex life or choice is none of your damned business. Take care of your own house and stay the hell out of mine....

0

joeblow 4 years, 11 months ago

When a persons sex life or choice stays in the private domain it is nobody's business, but when it enters the public domain, influences public policy and how I am to behave and think while influencing what my children see and hear as normal, then it should be the business of every right thinking person!

1

KeithVazParty 4 years, 7 months ago

Children cannot become gay by hearing about being gay in the World. Being gay is to do with genetics, not what they hear. By accepting gay people you just tell your children that you love them no matter who they are

0

sheeprunner12 4 years, 11 months ago

Yes, Joe .......... the perverted alphabet crew want all straights to accept their lifestyle and make us uncomfortable ....... despite their miniscule numbers.

If they stay in their lane ......... nobody will bother them. But now they want to test the US Constitution about not including gender as grounds for firing employees.

0

Well_mudda_take_sic 4 years, 11 months ago

Actual percentage in the U.S. is well under 1%, i.e. much less than 1 in 100. Seems like more, but that's because they are the only ones barking in public about their sexuality. The rest of us apparently feel secure enough about our own sexuality that we don't find ourselves compelled to loudly bark about it in public. If only they had a greater appreciation of the fact that discrimination feeds on, and grows from, loud barking of almost any kind. Oh well, it is what it is.

0

KeithVazParty 4 years, 7 months ago

Where did you get this statistic from? It’s actually 3.5% or close to 9 million Americans. Site: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.ed...">https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.ed...

0

Sign in to comment