0

EDITORIAL: Where's the firm 'no' we gave to the Braemar?

YOU would be forgiven if you were not comforted by the words of Renward Wells MP with regard to cruise ships.

The Transport Minister gave his response to the US Coast Guard’s bulletin stating that foreign-flagged vessels – such as cruise ships with Bahamian registration – should seek help from the countries whose flags they fly.

Obviously, this would be quite a problem for us if even one ship experienced a significant number of sick passengers or crew – and the scale of that emergency only gets greater for every further ship involved.

When the Braemar headed towards The Bahamas with several sick passengers on board in the middle of last month, the refusal was unequivocal.

First the Ministry of Transport put out a statement saying the Braemar would not be permitted to dock. Then the Prime Minister himself, Dr Hubert Minnis, weighed in, saying “we are a small country. We believe that the ship should call on a port which has the capacity to deal with the Braemar”.

The country has grown no larger since that moment, so surely Mr Wells is as full-throated in saying no to who knows how many cruise ships now?

Not so. Instead, he cherry picks his words in his latest statement, full of terms about working closely and devising safe methods of resupply, or providing places of shelter “under carefully controlled conditions”.

“What we have not been able to do,” he adds, “is take people from the ships ashore in our population centres.”

So what’s the alternative? Are we going to have a series of cruise ships parked offshore with sick people on board, desperately in need of doctors and ventilators that we may not be able to provide?

Are we going to watch while people die on board ships we won’t let land?

At the end of all this, the whole process of ship registry is going to be in desperate need of an overhaul – the race to be the cheapest place to offer registration provides neither substantial income for the country or the funds to be able to support ships in a situation like this.

That, however, is a battle for tomorrow. Today we must battle to ensure that any sick passengers or crew on board those ships are not just abandoned in our waters. These are people of many nationalities – American, Canadian, British, other European nations, from Asia and more. Are those nations really going to abandon their nationals here?

Our government should use every piece of political capital it has to reiterate to those countries that their people need a greater quantity of facilities than our country has to offer.

We are preparing very hard to deal with a more widespread outbreak than we have at present. Every death is a tragedy, and taking on ill patients from other countries because the ports the ships set sail from won’t let them back in is a sure way of overwhelming the healthcare system we have.

Saying no to these ships is not an act of unkindness, but a battle to ensure they get the healthcare they need. We want any sick people on board these ships to live – and for that they need more than we can offer.

Mr Wells’ statement is not strong enough in any way, shape or form – and it’s time for the government to be stronger.

Shelling out more for eggs

How many eggs did you eat last week? How about the week before? Are you eating more eggs than normal?

Because all of a sudden the price of eggs has doubled. Supply and demand, they say. A surge in demand for eggs has meant the supply has run short so the price has gone up.

But how can that be? Are we really, even while in isolation, suddenly eating many more eggs? Even taking into account the vast amount of food no longer being prepared in hotels and resorts?

Apparently, it’s all down to demand in the US, with people cleaning out the stores of eggs. Now when Bahamian buyers go to their US suppliers, up goes the price. The same number of people are likely going to be eating the same number of eggs, just they’ll have their fridges stacked with more than they need and so the rest run short.

Which came first, the panic buying or the price rise? At least that one’s easier to answer than the chicken or the egg.

Comments

moncurcool 4 years ago

I must say I disagree with the Tribune on this. We cannot have it both ways. We cannot want to run and boast that we have the highest ship registry on the world, and then when those ships get in trouble we want to throw up our hands and say it's not our responsibility. If I carry a Bahamian passport, whose responsibility is it to take care of me? If we don't want the responsibility of the ships, then we need to stop having them carry our flags. All decisions have consequence. Now, we are living with the consequence or our decision as a nation.

0

BahamaPundit 4 years ago

This is not a real nation. We have no military. We have no food security. We don't even have our own currency for crying out loud; it's pegged to the US dollar. We are virtually a giant airport in the middle of the sea. We are like Las Vegas surrounded by desert. Everyone knows this. Businessmen use our IBCs, because there are no corporate income taxes and no requirement for a national presence. They use our ship registry, because the inspections are less strict and the liabilities less onerous. You get what you pay for. You pay for fake, you get fake.

1

concerned799 4 years ago

Let the billion dollar cruise ships sort out the mess they have created by using flags of convineance to lower their taxes to zero and avoid all regulation. If they want someone to bail them out of this mess and offload all their passengers they can submit an offer to the Government with a cheque attached, and if its not enough try another country. For the right offer we can consider if it is in the national interest.

1

buddah17 4 years ago

I replied to this post, but don't see my reply??

0

Well_mudda_take_sic 4 years ago

That's because we've blocked all known representatives of the very dangerous cruise ship industry.

0

truetruebahamian 4 years ago

we are about 9th or 10th in line for ship registry numbers, Panama and Liberia being the leaders, and I doubt whether they would have the capacity to deal with what the U.S. is saying regarding responsibility. The actual owners must be held responsible and as the Bahamas doesn't own these craft the owners and their insurers are at the helm for safety for passengers and crew also upkeep of their vessels.

0

Bonefishpete 4 years ago

Just like when a Aztec aircraft crashes into the sea off NP Island and no one comes for the pilot. Well to be honest most pilots know they are on their own.

0

concerned799 4 years ago

I hope everyone is in agreement this industry needs to be driven out of existence. The threat of on board disease spreading is too high. This industry needs to be ended, not expanded. It needs to not be allowed to ever enter our waters again, people who wish to see the Bahamas can stay safely at one of our many hotels.

3

sheeprunner12 4 years ago

Agree 1000% …………. We benefit very little from cruise tourism, for the real COST to our nation …….. This is just another blackeye (cost) on us

1

Porcupine 4 years ago

Can't argue this one. We could have developed, and now should, a lower impact stay over tourism market that promotes Bahamian ownership, Bahamian culture, and the wondrous Bahamian environment. Cruise ships destroy our country and offer little in return. I'd be happy never to see them to return.

0

shonkai 4 years ago

Okay, let’s add a quarantine hotel and a hospital to those wonderful new plans for Nassau cruise harbour. Paid for by the ship registry.

0

Sign in to comment