0

Kwasi: Self-inflicted inflation from rushed boaters fees

By FAY SIMMONS

Tribune Business Reporter

jsimmons@tribunemedia.net

THE “rushed” boaters fee increase has caused “homegrown self-inflicted inflation” created by the Davis administration, according to Opposition finance spokesman Kwasi Thompson yesterday.

Speaking in Parliament yesterday, Mr Thompson accused the government of again not consulting with Family Island boat owners when making the amendments to the Boat Registration Bill and the Water Skiing and Motorboat Control Bill.

He said that commercial boat owners and fishermen have “very real challenges” and fee increases have a direct impact on Family Island residents, particularly those that reside on cays.

He said: “The PLP administration recently moved to suspend their rushed increase of fees on recreation and commercial boat owners. This calamity that we find ourselves in is the government’s own making. These fees were implemented without consultation, ignoring the human impact on small boaters and fishermen and on the cost of doing business and thus retail prices and partaking of marine products sold on average to the Bahamian kitchen table. This is what I call homegrown self-inflicted inflation.

“Unfortunately, the government has again not properly consulted in my constituency. You have not consulted with those who are in East Grand Bahama, who this bill will affect. There are very real challenges faced by small Bahamian commercial boat owners by small fishermen and these increases in the bill have a direct impact on the lives of those people in East Grand Bahama. Particularly in the East End settlements, including Sweetings Cay and Water Cay.”

He argued many Family Island residents use their boats similarly to how New Providence residents use their cars and it was “cruel” to implement such a large increase.

He said: “Many fishermen use their vessels to provide for their families, the same way in fact like Sweeting Cay the same way that we use our cars is the same way that they use their boats. It is cruel to increase registration and such an extreme way. The Fisheries Association has raised concerns that the smaller fisherman may simply just be unable to afford these fees.”

Mr Thompson also questioned how boat owners use their vessels for multiple purposes such as fishing, transportation and recreation should classify their boats.

He argued many Family Island residents use their boats as their primary means of transportation to the mainland for themselves and their families as well as fishing to earn a living.

He said: “What about the persons who live in Sweetings Cay who use their boats for multiple purposes. So, the bill makes a distinction between those who use their boats to carry persons and who use it for recreational purposes, that’s a different category commercial and then who use their boats for commercial fishermen.

“All of those boats usages have different rates. They charged different rates. Well in Sweeting’s Cay they use their boats for recreational purposes. But they also use the same boat to carry persons back and forward to Sweetings Cay and they also use the same boat to fish and to sell and to carry those fish and conch to the mainland to sell. So, they use their boats for different purposes all would fit within those categories. So which category should they now choose to go under?

“In the Family Islands, it is not as cut and dry as it is maybe in New Providence. The same boat as I said is used to fish, transport persons and for recreation purposes.”

He also argued the new requirements to provide records of crew training and boat maintenance prior to registration may be difficult for Family Island residents as many do not have formal training and perform most boat repairs themselves.

He said: “So you must present to the New Providence Port Authority a record of valid crew training. Most persons don’t have no formal training when you go on these boats and Family Islands but you must present a record of valid crew training. You must also present surveys conducted in the last 12 months. And my understanding is these surveys are expensive. And then how many of these surveys are to be produced? What does the survey need to say and what if it is not will you not be granted or will you not be registered if you don’t provide the service?

“You must also provide a history of dry docking you must also provide records of boat maintenance. Somebody in Sweeting’s Cay I guarantee that they don’t have a record of boat maintenance because most of them may provide the maintenance themselves.”

Comments

bahamas12345 1 month ago

My insurance requires a survey every 3 years because of the age of boat. Why does the govt need it every year? Also the training will be another scam like the truck license that you are supposed to have which most don't or even have proper license plates on the big trucks. You must also provide a history of dry docking why is this required?

1

The_Oracle 1 month ago

Some bright spark in Government (who should be named) has had a slew of bad ideas, not thought through but pushed through. Define "comprehensive marine insurance"? Must be purchased from a local licensed insurer? annual surveys? dry docking reports? Crew training reports? Is this for private and commercial? They added inspections for private, and don't seem to make a distinction between for the other onerous requirements either. And what carve out did they make for fishermen? sounds discriminatory. Is it by boat size or income level? last name or by relation to the P.M.?

1

birdiestrachan 1 month ago

The boat rates have not increased.for many.years.the regulations are necessary. It is important not to be willy nilly but Thompson would not know that .

0

Porcupine 1 month ago

Obviously not a boater and have no clue about the Family Islands. A most ridiculous comment, birdie.

0

birdiestrachan 1 month ago

Thompson works really hard trying to appear smart.he should put that bread basket VAT away what are bread basket items two mentioned here flour and cooking oil who benefited from that bakeries and hotels.

0

mandela 1 month ago

This is pure garbage, the PLP are now at the point of no return to office, that is.

0

sheeprunner12 1 month ago

The comment was made that only 50% of boat owners register their boats for the first time and NEVER register them again. That was BEFORE this ridiculous law was passed.

If that is the case, and most of the small boats are owned by Family Islanders, then the Govt has a huge task with compliance with this new law now. It is defeating the purpose of increasing the ease of using maritime traffic and ensuring practical boat ownership among the Out Islands.

Why does a guy with a tin boat & 10HP need insurance, dry docking etc to go and catch a few grunts & conchs??

0

Porcupine 1 month ago

sheeprunner12, Be careful about asking pertinent questions. The cost of enforcing these onerous regulations will far outweigh the revenue being brought in. At some point, there will be a violent confrontation between the Fisheries officers or police and those Family Islanders who have simply had enough. This truly seems to be an out of control government The people simply can't take any more taxes and rules.

0

Sign in to comment