0

'Mexican stand-off' on VAT bonded warehouses

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

The Government’s bonded warehouse plan to prevent Value-Added Tax (VAT) ‘double taxation’ has been branded “impossible and not practical” by the private sector, its Tax Coalition co-chair warning: “It’s not going to happen.”

Robert Myers told Tribune Business that the Government was increasingly taking “a very dictatorial position” on key aspects of VAT implementation, and was seemingly uninterested in the private sector’s alternative proposal.

He disclosed that instead of bonded warehouses, the private sector had proposed a certified inventory audit at around the implementation date - currently July 1 - with companies receiving a tax credit on sales of this stock.

This would prevent Bahamian companies being hit by the ‘whammy’ of higher pre-VAT Customs duty rates and the new tax’s 15 per cent levy, ensuring sales post-July 1 only attracted the newer, lower border rates.

The Government has proposed bonded warehouses to achieve the same result, with these operating for three months - two months prior to VAT implementation, and one post. This would allow stick removed post-VAT to attract the lower Duty rates.

However, private sector executives have warned that this solution is not practical for industries such as the auto sector, which are on four-five month ordering cycles, and others who are buying in bulk from markets such as Asia and Latin America.

Importers engaged in this business are on ordering cycles up to six months out, while the Government’s other suggestions to manage the VAT transition - such as companies running their stock down - has been deemed impossible because it will leave them unable to meet customer needs.

“It’s unacceptable. The business community won’t accept it,” Mr Myers told Tribune Business of the bonded warehouse goal. ‘It can’t happen in a business system. There’s no possibly way to do what they want us to do.

“They need to take an inventory at the point of turnover [to VAT], and give us back credit on the inventory in stock, so we’re not double taxed.”

Acknowledging that such inventory audits would have to be signed off on and certified, the Coalition for Responsible Taxation’s co-chair said the Government’s insistence on certain technical aspects of VAT implementation was making his job even harder.

Emphasising that he wanted to build consensus between the Government and private sector, Mr Myers said this was being made impossible because the former was merely “inciting and infuriating” his constituents.

“Bonded warehouses are just not practical. Separate warehouses are not possible, not practical,” he told Tribune Business. “They [the Government] have no understanding of industry or business.

“It’s not up for discussion. It’s a standstill. What are they [the Government] going to do? We’re not going to do it. We’re at a Mexican stand-off.

“If they don’t want to listen, don’t want to negotiate, we’re at a Mexican stand-off. Good luck pushing VAT. It’s [bonded warehouses] not practical and not going to happen,” Mr Myers added.

“They’re going to have to bend in certain areas. I challenge anyone to go into these major warehouses and figure out how they’re going to do that. They’ll just have to bend or break.”

The Tax Coalition co-chair said the Government wanted the private sector to convert its own warehouses into bonded facilities, something all major importers - whether food retailers and wholesalers, hardware and houseware suppliers - had said was not an appropriate solution.

Mr Myers said “the only way we can get the consumer the pricing they want and can afford is to buy in volume”, which was why some Bahamas-based businesses had diversified their supply sources to Latin America, China and the Far East.

As a result, these companies were purchasing in bulk on six month order cycles, a period twice as long as the ‘bonded warehouse’ proposal, and which raised the risk of ‘double taxation’ post VAT.

As for the Government’s suggestion that companies could run their inventory down just prior to VAT’s implementation, Mr Myers responded: “You can’t run inventory down because people will starve, they will have no selection and destroy sales, which are already hurting like hell. Why is it so difficult to do an inventory check at a specific date?”

Asked by Tribune Business about how the Government and Ministry of Finance had responded to the private sector’s alternative proposals, Mr Myers replied: “The same as always: Nothing.

“Their idea of negotiating is: ‘We’ll tell you what to do, and you’ll listen’. That’s their idea of negotiating. They’re not listening. It’s a one-way street.

“If they want to harden their position, we’ll harden our position. Forget the Government: How’s that going to help the country?”

Mr Myers said the Government was unable to understand why bonded warehouses were not a viable solution because it was not a businessman, and did not understand the private sector well enough.

“They’re just infuriating the private sector; these groups that have inventory issues,” he told Tribune Business. “We’re hearing back from them, and they’re just more and more infuriated.

“This makes the process more and more difficult. I’m the consensus guy, and what’s happening is not healthy. The discussions between the Ministry of Finance technocrats and these specific industries have not been productive.

“You can continue to incite and infuriate the private sector, or you can negotiate. This is one of the things that you can’t negotiate on.”

Comments

B_I_D___ 10 years, 2 months ago

To add insult to injury...whenever you need to transfer stock from you 'bonded warehouse' to your live inventory, government is wanting to charge you a 'processing fee' for accessing your own merchandise, that you have already paid all applicable fees on already. Bull crap!!

1

crawfish 10 years, 2 months ago

It would appear that much of the Regs. relating to VAT are written to keep the Merchant Class honest. It has been a long held belief that the Merchant Class, through bribery of Customs Agents, and other Officials, is responsible for much of the loss in Revenue to the Public Treasury.

It would also appear that it is the Merchant Class which is so vocal in its opposition to the introduction of VAT.

In the coming months, Government will have to deal with all sorts of threats from these folks, as the day nears when it will become more difficult to side-step Customs Duties, and other Government Fees.

DO NOT feel sorry for them, or get caught up in their web of lies and slight of hand. They have had their way much too long. With VAT they will have to toe the line, or spend some time in Fox Hell.

0

B_I_D___ 10 years, 2 months ago

As a member of the so called merchant class I take offense to that. We are above board and pay every single tax, customs, NIB, Business License, etc. We work hand in hand with customs to weed out the 'small fry' out there trying to bring things in illegally or with false documentation. The number of commercial fishing vessels that also go over to Florida for 'service', load up their holds with merchandise and bring them back into the Bahamas and clear them through customs as 'ships stores'...then turn around and off load the product and sell it through smaller grocery stores is staggering. There are a few bad apples out there no doubt, but most of your bigger players are doing it right. The last big trouble maker was Robin Hood Enterprises, but their dishonest ways finally caught up with them.

1

The_Oracle 10 years, 2 months ago

Why single out the merchants? If one is addressing fraud, dishonesty, theft, one could be talking about anyone from any walk of life, especially in the Bahamas, local or foreign. Individuals should be held accountable for their actions, period. Politicians especially. In any case, the merchants are the meat and potatoes of the economy, hence the want and need to tax them. You can tax the poor man, but he has not much to give!

1

sheeprunner12 10 years, 2 months ago

Oracle, the merchant class were once called the Bay Street Boys!!!!!!!!!

Dont you think the PLP has forgotten them!!!!!!!!!!!

The merchants have successfully retarded our agricultural and manufacturing sectors by being given carte blanche control of the retail sector that depends almost solely on imported goods.

What we really need is a concerted effort to increase local production

VAT is just another band-aid solution

0

ohdrap4 10 years, 2 months ago

Going off on a tangent here:

The radio talk shows reported that Branville McCartney and Rupert Roberts were present in the Rodney Moncur March.

VAT makes strange bedfellas. lol

0

The_Oracle 10 years, 2 months ago

Perhaps the sins of the fathers do catch up Sheeprunner, however, recognized shop fronts, are audited multiple times a year for N.I.B. for instance, because they are easy to find,and they do keep legit books. The other 60-80% fly by the seat of their pants, are difficult to track down, fly under the radar. Ingraham knew exactly what he was doing when he created a "Tax Unit" in the ministry of Finance (Budget Comm. 2010) The IMF has been lending, guiding, granting and now telling them what to do for decades. Tying together a picture of all the revenues, fees and taxes from a given entity or person has enlightened the Government bean counters, who desperately need and want the inside economic picture. After all, if you are going to be taxing income, you need to see the money at all stages! VAT is a stepping stone to first world accountability and personal liability to government.

0

Sign in to comment