0

Dna Wanted 14 Seats Uncontested During Coalition Talks With Fnm

DNA leader Branville McCartney.

DNA leader Branville McCartney.

By RASHAD ROLLE

Tribune Staff Reporter

rrolle@tribunemedia.net

DURING negotiations for a union between their two parties earlier this year, Democratic National Alliance Leader Branville McCartney wanted the Free National Movement to leave as many as 14 seats uncontested to clear the way for DNA candidates in those constituencies, sources familiar with the talks said.

But the negotiations broke down during the summer after FNM Leader Dr Hubert Minnis refused Mr McCartney’s request, The Tribune understands.

The two parties aroused national interest in May when they appeared open to forming a coalition to challenge the Progressive Liberal Party.

Mr McCartney and Dr Minnis negotiated terms for the union over several months, meeting face-to-face multiple times with advisors and high-ranking officials in the party, The Tribune understands.

The pair had several meetings prior to the FNM’s convention in July and just after that.

However, the talks fell through after the two failed to compromise on two key issues: the number of seats the FNM would leave uncontested, and the question of whether the DNA would disband and join the party.

Mr McCartney wanted the FNM to leave “30 per cent” of constituencies uncontested to increase the chances of DNA candidates winning in those areas, well-placed sources told The Tribune.

One of those seats was Bamboo Town, Mr McCartney’s former seat, now represented by Renward Wells.

Mr Wells ran on the PLP’s ticket in 2012 before quitting the party to join the FNM in 2015.

Dr Minnis, however, was only willing to leave three or four seats uncontested by the FNM, The Tribune was told.

The FNM was also adamant that the DNA completely disband and join the party, a request Mr McCartney refused.

“A number of things were discussed as possible arrangements between our two parties,” FNM Deputy Leader Peter Turnquest said when contacted by The Tribune yesterday.

“Those discussions fell down on the inflexibility of Mr McCartney. We were not about to capitulate to the likes of the DNA.

“Their requests were obviously unacceptable to the FNM. We are a national party intent on recapturing the government of the Bahamas. We are confident in our ability to win an election and we are not distracted by the imaginations of the DNA or Mr McCartney,” Mr Turnquest said.

In May, FNM Chairman Sidney Collie denied that high-level discussions over a potential coalition had taken place between the DNA and the FNM.

“There are no negotiations, absolutely no negotiations by the leader and none by the chairman,” he said at the time.

Mr McCartney could not be reached for comment up to press time yesterday.

However, in the past he has blamed the failure for a partnership between the two parities on Dr Minnis, saying he lacks political acumen.

In September, he said a union between them would help the FNM but hurt the DNA.

“They have lost a significant amount of support in this country and although you may have a number of persons wanting to see some type of union, going and dealing with the FNM is like changing decks on the Titanic,” he said at the time. “That would not benefit the DNA. It will benefit the FNM.”

And last week he underscored that past talks between himself and the FNM leader “came to naught” because the established party was insistent that the DNA be dissolved and refused to credit the organisation as a viable political force. Mr McCartney noted that the discussion was remarkably easier with Mrs Butler-Turner, who focused instead on national goals and was “very much on the same page” as he on national issues.

“Discussions (with Dr Minnis) going on from that seemed to have come to a standstill, a road block, knowing full well that we want what is good for this country but having those discussions were, seemed to have been, difficult to say the least.

“The discussions with (Mrs Butler-Turner), we are on one accord with regards to where the country ought to go. It was very easy discussion for the most part,” Mr McCartney said on Tuesday.

The DNA is now engaging in an “alliance” with “rebel seven” leader Loretta Butler-Turner, who was sworn in as leader of the Official Opposition last week Sunday.

This came days after she and six other FNM MPs wrote a letter to Governor General Dame Marguerite Pindling expressing no confidence in Dr Minnis.

Mrs Butler-Turner announced last week that she has appointed Mr McCartney as leader of Opposition Business in the Senate.

Last week, it was also revealed that the two had been in discussions long before the MPs ousted Dr Minnis from his post. She told The Nassau Guardian that she had entered discussions with the third party leader in 2014, when she first contested the FNM’s leadership post and lost to Dr Minnis.

Comments

sealice 3 years, 3 months ago

this won't fly - he's trying to make himself another PLP entrenched PM going for his 3rd term

1

theplpsucks 3 years, 3 months ago

oh hell no. he claims he doesnt need the fnm, let him win his own seats hes too arrogant.

1

DEDDIE 3 years, 3 months ago

Although I believe that a coalition will be good for both parties, the asking price was a bit too much. The person who lack political acumen is Branville McCartney. If Minnis is so bad a leader whether the FNM wins or loss, they will soon need a leader.

1

Greentea 3 years, 3 months ago

38/39 seats and they were asking for 14 leaving you with 24/25? I don't think that was too much- 3/4 was definitely too little.

2

DDK 3 years, 3 months ago

Realizing, of course, there was no guarantee that the man's green party would actually win those seats!

0

DEDDIE 3 years, 3 months ago

We are talking about a third party. If history is any indication the DNA will win no seat. It will be foolish for the FNM not to contest 14 seats. Two seats under an FNM banner is a fair price. Another bargain I could live with is allowing the DNA to ran in those area which are PLP stronghold like Bain Town and Farm Road.

0

Economist 3 years, 3 months ago

If history is any indication, they can win seats. You forget the 1977 election.

1

justthefactsplease 3 years, 3 months ago

If history is any indication, they don't need to win a seat to ensure the FNM does not win the election as happened in 2012. The truth is that the DNA will win more votes than they did then and the FNM cannot win with the DNA pulling 20,000 votes of the 80,000 or so who will vote.

1

Alex_Charles 3 years, 3 months ago

I honestly don't care what the DNA or FNM does. I'm not voting for either and I damn sure as hell will NEVER support the PLP. I will either vote an independent that has a pulse or write in Bernie Sanders.

0

DDK 3 years, 3 months ago

I am beginning to think Ms. Butler-Turner and Mr McCartney deserve each other.

1

yari 3 years, 3 months ago

Is the Tribune even a real newspaper any more? All we have is this 'information' citing 'sources familiar with the negotiations'. Really? As the saying goes "mouth can say anything' but a real news source needs credibility and that is something this newspaper lacks. The agenda of some of the Tribune 'reporters' is abundantly clear - they need to move to The Punch where innuendo and insinuations are the order of the day.

0

Sign in to comment