0

Grand Lucayan needs Gov’t to ‘strong arm’

THE Government is today being urged to use “strong arm” tactics to ensure the Grand Lucayan’s rapid sale and re-opening, a prominent attorney warning: “Freeport will disappear otherwise.”

Terence Gape, senior partner at Dupuch & Turnquest, writes in a Page 3B column in Tribune Business that the Minnis administration has ample justification to ‘get tough’ with the hotel’s owner, Cheung Kong (CK) Property Holdings.

Expressing disappointment that the Government is not yet in position to “cut the deal” with Hutchison Whampoa’s Hong Kong-based successor, Mr Gape describes the Grand Lucayan’s relaunch as the “essential first ingredient” to turning Freeport and Grand Bahama around.

“We’ve got to strong arm them,” he told Tribune Business of CK Property Holdings. “That hotel is in the nature of an essential service in this town. Without it, the town will disappear.

“There are zero investors and zero investments. That’s quite a fact. The businesses here are just hanging on by their finger nails. Around 60 per cent are struggling to meet payroll. There’s no money, no tourist dollars. We have to get that hotel open, otherwise we might not survive.”

The impact from the Grand Lucayan’s year-long closure has rippled throughout the Freeport economy. In terms of direct effects, these have included the loss of more than 1,000 jobs; a 59 per cent decline in room inventory and reduced airlift capacity; and a more than $9 million or 62 per cent fall in year-over-year room revenue.

The indirect impact has included job losses and business closures at the Port Lucaya Marketplace; the Grand Celebration encountering difficulties in finding sufficient hotel rooms for its overnight passengers; and depopulation of Grand Bahama as persons seek work on other islands.

Explaining the effects in personal terms, Mr Gape told Tribune Business: “My law firm has been here 50 years, and if we depended on Freeport business today we’d be closed.

“We’re lucky we have a country-wide practice and international practice. Freeport used to cover all our expenses and generate 50 per cent of our gross, which covered all our costs. Now Freeport covers nothing. There’s no business.

“What do you think that means when the lawyers are starving? Most lawyers don’t have country-wide practices, and don’t have international practices. It’s dire. It’s very dire.”

Mr Gape, however, praised the Government’s decision to renegotiate the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) agreed with the Grand Bahama Port Authority’s (GBPA) shareholder families as part of its repeal of the Christie administration’s Freeport investment incentives legislation.

The senior Dupuch & Turnquest partner told Tribune Business that while the MoU had “some good stuff in it, it has no teeth” to compel the Haywards and St Georges, plus Hutchison Whampoa, to follow through on their obligations.

He writes today that the Government needs to focus on what he terms “Holy Grail” or three commitments - to create a “world class investment promotional entity” for Freeport; that the two largest land-owning companies develop master plans within 12 months (the deadline expired in late April 2017); and that the two families would “market and sell” their GBPA equity interests.

Mr Gape told Tribune Business that it was unclear whether the Grand Bahama Development Company (DevCo) and Freeport Commercial and Industrial had met their obligations. The latter is an affiliate of the GBPA’s Port Group Ltd, while DevCo is 50 per cent owned and management controlled by Hutchison Whampoa.

Referring to DevCo, Mr Gape argued: “I make the point that Hutchison, as far as I’m concerned, is in breach of its Hawksbill Creek Agreement obligations even though they were not a party to the original agreement.

“They took over DevCo, the harbour and the airport, and they’re in bad order. DevCo should have been the engine to cause Freeport to be the first in the country, but it is doing nothing, and that is Hutchison.”

Mr Gape said that while DevCo did not exist under the original Hawksbill Creek Agreement, it was an “absolute covenantor” in the 1992 batch of Freeport-related legislation enacted by the Ingraham administration. And when Hutchison subsequently acquired its 50 per cent equity stake and management control, it became subject to those covenants.

“DevCo has never lived up to them,” Mr Gape said. “Now, under the MoU, DevCo has made further promises that I don’t know if it’s fulfilled. And the same with Freeport Commercial & Industrial.

“These people [the GBPA owners] have been running Freeport for 40 years, and Hutchison for 20 years, and the Government gives them one year to produce a master plan? It’s ridiculous. It’s ridiculous to give them the time, and ridiculous that they need the time.”

Mr Gape explained that he was making the point that such master plans for the development of DevCo and Freeport Commercial and Industrial’s landholdings should have been developed decades ago.

He added that the GBPA families appeared to have made little effort to market and sell their GBPA interest, suggesting the MoU contained “half-hearted promises”.

“That’s why I call these three issues ‘the Holy Grail’,” Mr Gape told Tribune Business. “If we get the hotel open, get it in the hands of someone solid, get some real strength into these MoU provisions, in three-five years Freeport could turn. It won’t be easy, but it could happen.”

Comments

Economist 6 years, 6 months ago

The government must find a way to force the St.Georges out. The GBPA is not doing as it should under the Hawksbill Creek Agreement and its shareholders should be made to sell.

The young St. Georges are not capable to lead, they are holding Bahamians back.

0

Well_mudda_take_sic 6 years, 5 months ago

Government forcing HW to either re-open the Lucaya hotel properties or offer them for sale at a price low enough to attract foreign buyers is one thing. But government bailing out HW by buying the loss-making properties at an exorbitant price is entirely different thing and would be an all around losing proposition for the Bahamian people. Questions to be asked and related matters to be fully investigated include the following: (1) How did government so quickly arrive at the price that it bid? (2) Why is government the only bidder at the exorbitant minimum reserve price being demanded by HW? (3) Why would government submit a bid without first having identified suitably qualified and reputable hotel operators that would be willing to manage the properties, and without having agreed in principle the key terms under which they would operate and manage the properties for government? Is HW currently a major contributor to the FNM party or expected to be one in the near future? Was HW a significant funder of the FNM party's last general election campaign? All of these questions must be answered by Minnis who promised his supporters time and time again during the last general election campaign that his government would set the gold standard for transparency in doing the people's business.

0

Well_mudda_take_sic 6 years, 5 months ago

Here's how this very foolish proposition by Minnis is going to play out:

1) Government will grossly overpay Hutchison Whampoa for the hotel properties.

2) Government will then have to pay an arm and a leg to the operator(s) it hires to operate and manage the hotel properties.

3) With no ownership skin in the game, the hired operator(s) will only be interested in their operating and management fees with no incentive to mitigate the massive operating losses that will be for the account of the government (no reputable hotel operator would dare take on the risk of having their fees tied in any way to the occupancy rates or loss making performance of these hotel properties).

4) The government will quickly rack up massive unsustainable losses from its ownership of the hotel properties and be forced to try find one or more buyers.

5) Government will find, as Hutchison Whampoa has found, that it is unable to sell the hotel properties without incurring a mammoth loss on its investment and without granting the buyer(s) enormously unreasonable giveaway concessions that would make the Red Chinese owners of Baha Mar very green with envy.

6) Bahamian taxpayers get left royally screwed by all and sundry with mega millions and millions of dollars added to our annual deficits and national debt, and with Grand Bahama ending up no better off because of the government's failure to address the real reasons why Hutchison Whampoa was unwilling to re-open and operate the hotel properties in the first place.

Yes indeed....Bahamians all over the Bahamas must ask: "Why is Minnis so willing to flush our nation down the proverbial toilet by buying these loss making properties at an exorbitant price from Hutchison Whampoa, a deep pocket Red Chinese conglomerate?" No right minded government would ever do this! As the saying goes, something smells rotten in the state of Denmark and it's not the Danish Blue cheese!!

0

Sign in to comment