0

Anglicans should not canonise Bishop Tutu

EDITOR, The Tribune.

South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu died on Boxing Day in Cape Town at the ripe age of 90. The recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1984, Tutu, along with Nelson Mandela and FW de Klerk, was instrumental in dismantling the Apartheid system implemented by the White South African National Party, after its ascent to high office in 1948.

In 1991, de Klerk, who died in November of this year, repealed many of the Apartheid laws enacted by the late Prime Minister Henrik Verwoerd in 1959, or thereabouts. Verwoerd’s infamous Promotion of Bantu Self-Government Act of 1959 underscored the heinous nature of state-sanctioned White Supremacy in South Africa. It was built on the racist foundation of the 1913 Land Act that Verwoerd’s racist political ancestors had enacted.

Over three million South Africans were forcibly relocated from their homes and dumped in the 10 Bustustan ghettos between 1961 and 1994, due to this Apartheid policy. While Verwoerd was busy legislating segregation laws in 1959, Tutu was studying theology at St Peter’s Theological College in Rosettenville, South Africa.

Three years later in 1961, Tutu was ordained to the Anglican priesthood. He would serve as chaplain of the University of Fort Hare, a post he was appointed to in 1967. He also served as Anglican bishop of Lesotho and chairman of the South African Council of Churches. In 1985, Tutu was appointed the first Black Bishop of Johannesburg and the first Black Archbishop of Cape Town in 1986. Subsequent to news of his passing, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said that Tutu was one of several “outstanding South Africans who bequeathed to us a liberated South Africa”. The Dalai Lama described Tutu as a “true humanitarian”. According to former US President Barack Obama, the late South African Anglican clergyman was a “moral compass” to him. And current Cape Town Archbishop Thabo Makagoba said that Tutu’s legacy was his moral strength.

Born in October 1931 in Klerksdorp, Tutu was appointed as chairman of the African National Congress (ANC) government of then President Nelson Mandela’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission in 1994, which was tasked with investigating the atrocities committed by the Apartheid government and anti-Apartheid organisations. While Tutu used his massive religious platform to fight Apartheid throughout the 1980s, groups such as the Pan-African Congress, the ANC, the Congress of the People and the South Indian National Congress all engaged the White South African administration from a political standpoint, and in some instances, from a violent standpoint. One case in point is the ANC’s Umkhanto we Sizwe, a militia group founded by Mandela. This group was the HAMAS and Hezbollah of South Africa. Mandela’s involvement with this terrorist organisation was one of the reasons he spent 27 years in prison, between 1963 and 1990. Tutu found himself caught between the violent White South African administration and these Black revolutionary groups. In 1980, Tutu was arrested for his anti-Apartheid activism, which is a testament of his unwavering opposition to the racist system.

The Anglican Church of South Africa will hold a requiem mass at St. George’s Cathedral in Cape Town. An interfaith service will also be held in his honour. All in all, Tutu lived a very productive life. Bahamian Anglicans can applaud his willingness to boldly confront an overtly racist system which was demeaning to Black South Africans and other ethnic groups. In this regard, remembering his anti-Apartheid activism is a fitting eulogy. Having said that, however, Bahamian Anglicans must resist the temptation to canonise the famed South African cleric. In 2013, Tutu was quoted as saying that he “would not worship a God who is homophobic”. Calling South Africa a “rainbow nation”, Tutu would go to launch his anti-LGBTQ campaign, going as far as advocating for same-sex marriage. His acceptance of homosexuality tells me that he outright rejected the biblical injunction against Sodomy. Not only was Tutu at odds with the Christian Bible, but he was also at odds with the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion – the essential doctrinal beliefs of the Anglican communion, which appear to be Calvinistic in tone. In Article 7, which concerns the Old Testament, it is stated that “no Christian man is free from obedience of the Commandments which are called Moral”. Article 9, titled “Of Original or Birth Sin,” rightly stated that humanity is “inclined to evil”.

This was especially evident with Tutu’s anti-LGBTQ activism and his willingness to appoint and promote gay priests. Decrying opposition to homosexuality, Tutu conflated mere opposition rooted in love to hatred of gay people. In reality, however, not every form of discrimination is bad. For instance, no right-thinking parent would entrust their children to a known paedophile; nor would a sane woman feel comfortable sleeping in the same room with a known serial rapist. Evangelical Anglicans know that God loves sinners. That is why He made provision for their salvation by sending His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ, to die for us. After salvation, the process of sanctification begins. This includes purity in the area of human sexuality. God will never compromise His infinite moral standards for anyone; and that includes the late Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

KEVIN EVANS

Freeport, Grand Bahama

December 29, 2021.

Comments

1pnewman 2 years, 4 months ago

'Tutu conflated mere opposition rooted in love to hatred of gay people. In reality, however, not every form of discrimination is bad. For instance, no right-thinking parent would entrust their children to a known paedophile'
I reject your theory that the opposition was rooted in love. Its not discrimination, its bigotry, encased in religious sanctimony. Your analogy of a pedophile aand homosexuality betrays your ignorance and lack of understanding of the pluralistic and secular world we live in. Typical of uneducated bible bashers.

0

VincentSmiles 2 years, 3 months ago

Mr. Evans seriously misunderstands how to interpret the Bible. If he believes that biblical commands are to be followed literally, then he needs to consider that BOTH testaments of Scripture approve of slavery. If we followed the Bible literally we would never have condemned that evil institution. The Bible allows things we condemn (e.g. slavery) and condemns things that we allow (e.g. lending money at interest: Exodus 22:25; Leviticus 25:36-37). Intelligent interpretation of the Bible requires recognizing the vast amounts of knowledge and progress humans have gained since biblical times, including in the area of human sexuality. Bishop Desmond Tutu was a wise and compassionate Christian who knew what it means to interpret the Bible with justice. Mr. Evans and other fundamentalists need to learn this also - the sooner the better.

0

Sign in to comment