0

HYPOCRITES: Minnis attacks Davis govt for giving no-bid contract - having blasted FNM on same issue

FORMER Prime Minister Dr Hubert Minnis. Photo: Donavan McIntosh/Tribune staff

FORMER Prime Minister Dr Hubert Minnis. Photo: Donavan McIntosh/Tribune staff

By RASHAD ROLLE

Tribune Senior Reporter

rrolle@tribunemedia.net

FORMER Prime Minister Dr Hubert Minnis said the Davis administration’s decision to give a no-bid contract to Colina Insurance Limited for services under the Bahamas Travel Health Visa programme “was more than hypocritical”.

_

Advertisement

He said it is not fair to compare that contract award with his administration’s decision to give Kanoo Pays a no-bid contract for payment processing services under the same scheme.

“You (are) trying to compare apples with grapes,” he said. “I think it’s more than hypocritical because we were in an emergency situation when we did that, they were not in an emergency situation when they did this.”

Deputy Prime Minister Chester Cooper said on Tuesday there was no tendering process for the insurance contract because of time constraints. He said the previous provider, CG Atlantic, was not forthcoming with details about the performance of its programme and Colina offered the government a better rate.

 Dr Minnis said: “I see them say Atlantic did not answer certain questions or whatever, but only time will tell whether Atlantic did submit or not under these new circumstances.”

 In his audit of the visa programme released last week, Auditor General Terrance Bastian criticised the lack of competitive bidding that has characterised the visa programme since its inception. In addition to the insurance and payment processing services, there was no competitive bidding originally for companies that completed the software for the online platform, provided rapid antigen tests on day five of arrival and managed the approved testing labs and Day 5 tests.

 Mr Bastian acknowledged the time pressures officials faced in executing the visa programme, but said the services should have gone out to tender, particularly the insurance service given the significant costs associated with that service.

 Yesterday, Dr Minnis said: “When we did that, the contract, we had two weeks to open the country. We had already sent out notices that we were opening the country. We had a decision to make. If we didn’t open, having sent out notices around the world, The Bahamas would get a black eye and it would set our industry backwards and it would subsequently affect our economy moving forward. We had to make quick decisions within two weeks.

 “We had called around, all the various different insurance companies, inclusive of BAF. Nobody wanted to bid. We subsequently called Atlantic and Atlantic was interested and they submitted and that’s how we ended up with Atlantic. We had to do that route because we had to get the country open and, yes, we had to utilise the Promotion of Tourism Act to ensure that we were still within the framework of the law.

“Now, they have gone for a no-bid, they had sufficient time, unlike us, we were in an emergency situation. Two, they would know exactly what Atlantic is being paid in terms of insurance and therefore they could cherry pick and pick a company and say can you beat what Atlantic is doing.”

Comments

tribanon 2 years, 2 months ago

Translation: "How dare you chastise me for being corrupt when you just as corrupt as me!" LMAO

1

sheeprunner12 2 years, 2 months ago

I think we use the word "corrupt" very loosely ............ why do you think that this Colina deal is corrupt vs the Kanoo deal?

Giving one company an unfair advantage is not necessarily corrupt ....... It only becomes corrupt if someone connected directly to the deal gets a financial gain out of the deal.

Maybe you can tell us more about HOW Minnis and Chester have benefitted financially from these deals

0

tribanon 2 years, 2 months ago

The word "corrupt" is often associated with the word "bribe" as is the well known phrase, "favours for favours." And anyone with an ounce of common sense knows why corrupt elected officials tend to favour an uneven or unequal playing field over a level one when it comes to procuring goods and services using taxpayers' funds.

1

TalRussell 2 years, 2 months ago

I think its fair to pronounce that we UK Colony's jury of electors' on de 16 September 2021, closely listened to aggravating or mitigating circumstances to to decide what sentence would best achieve the objectives of denouncing, deterring the governing 39 Red House MP offenders, and decided that separating of 35 of de offenders, and after further taking under consideration, determined that not even a single one, has never acknowledged the hardships' done to constituent victims, And by distancing them, far away from de PopoulacesPurse, was best to protect whatever lil monies and furnitures', might still remain in de vault ....And that, any hope for rehabilitating de offending Red hypocrites, would be a fruitless waste of time. and everything else like this and that, ― Yes?

1

birdiestrachan 2 years, 2 months ago

The hypocrite himself. The master hypocrite calling others hypocrite

He can add to himself a masterful liar and very mean spirited

He wants to fight and break they backside.

0

tribanon 2 years, 2 months ago

Minnis is history and you really need to be much more concerned about Cooper, especially if you care as you're always saying you do about the PLP. Cooper alone has great potential for fatally crippling the Davis led PLP administration thereby making it 'one-and-done'. LOL

0

moncurcool 2 years, 2 months ago

Amazing how you do not even speak to the issue he is referring to, but completely ignored the fact. Keep being blinded with political partisanship and let those now in power bleed the country dry.

0

SP 2 years, 2 months ago

PLP & FNM are two sides of the same coin! Neither is worth wasting my time reading the article.

0

sheeprunner12 2 years, 2 months ago

The coin you are talking about is The Bahamas.

You better pay attention

0

Sign in to comment