The Tribune

EDITOR, The Tribune.

The recent decision of Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) leader, Brave Davis, to overlook Shane Gibson as the party’s standard bearer is not just a matter of political strategy; it’s an emblematic statement about where the party stands and the direction it hopes to take. For the astute political observer, this move demands both rigorous analysis and critique.

One cannot ignore the obvious: politics is as much about perception as it is about policy. In an era where soundbites often eclipse substantive discussions and where scandals, regardless of their veracity, can spell the end of a political career, it becomes imperative for a party to strategically choose its candidates. Shane Gibson, despite his laudable service as a government minister, has unfortunately been tethered to perceptions of impropriety.

Even though he has been legally cleared of corruption charges, in the unforgiving realm of politics, the stains of suspicion rarely fade, especially in the memories of voters. The court of public opinion operates on an entirely different set of rules, often far removed from principles of justice and fairness. It’s a sobering reminder of the aphorism: “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”

In sidelining Gibson, Brave Davis is making a calculated bet. He’s prioritising the party’s broader image over individual loyalty, arguing that the PLP’s appeal to new and independent voters — an increasingly crucial demographic — would be compromised with Gibson on the ticket. These voters, unanchored by historical allegiances, are often swayed by present perceptions. Davis seems to understand that being on the wrong side of public opinion is a formula for electoral defeat, no matter how unjust that opinion might be.

It’s a harsh reality of contemporary politics: perception, more than ever, shapes electoral outcomes. Gibson’s sidelining may feel unfair to many, especially considering his tangible achievements. Still, in the cutthroat arena of politics, sometimes tough decisions are made not for the past or even the present, but with an eye firmly fixed on the future.

In closing, while this decision might seem ruthless to some, it underscores a hard truth: politics is often a game of optics. In sidelining Gibson, the PLP is making a clear statement about its priorities and the lengths it’s willing to go to protect its brand and appeal to a wider, more unpredictable electorate.

The Gatekeeper

October 26, 2023